Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives https://forum.metal-archives.com/ |
|
Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please) https://forum.metal-archives.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4153 |
Page 185 of 239 |
Author: | Turner [ Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/M ... /danmarder has this been discussed yet? it's pure drivel. i can understand a positive review of an unpopular album coming off as a little defensive, but this? it's basically "the new ManOwaR album rulez and if u dont liek it thats cuz ur not metal enough!" that, and he's wrong. |
Author: | Midnightwards666 [ Tue Sep 04, 2012 1:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
I'm not too sure this review deserves a place on the Archives. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/R ... ConorFynes |
Author: | TadakatsuH0nda [ Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
The only thing this guy seems to summarize is how bad the vocals are, and that's the lone point he argues for his entire review stating "crappy celine dion vocals" multiple times despite it being such a tiny review, it's a much deeper release than just the vocals and that's really the only dimension of the music he brings up. I've found a couple of his other reviews a bit iffy too. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/X ... hadowsfall |
Author: | hey [ Wed Sep 05, 2012 12:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Should this review for Gris - Il Était une Forêt... still be here? I can see how it was accepted as is the first review giving the album less than a 90%, but another more in-depth review has been added since then that also gave it a less-than-stellar score. The review itself doesn't really discuss the music very much, besides lamenting over the lack of a keyboard. |
Author: | BastardHead [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 12:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Apart from his confusing score/content ratio, I would possibly accept it as a bare bones 3 pointer. Despite being short and missing the point (I've never listened to Gris, but it sounds like he expected something different and rated down based on that alone, which is stupid), the entirety of the review is spent talking about the music. |
Author: | hey [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 11:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Fair enough, I just thought he spent more time talking about what he thought the album should've been instead of what the music actually consisted of. If it were to be a response to the other review's I guess it'd have served its purpose well, but as a stand-alone review, I still don't think it really contributes very much. All the same, I guess I can see how it'd just narrowly get in. |
Author: | Cendelence [ Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/S ... _Blood_-_Môt_chûyên...chua_quên/349333/ I don't care if it's written by a mod, this review for a Satanic Warmaster split not publicly released is just fucking atrocious. I can say for certain this guy does not own a copy and is reviewing it off some rip a traitor mistakenly given a copy put up. This zero 0% review is short, far from the point and reads as very rushed. I don't think there is a single sentence spent critiquing the music, all he does is whine about the recording quality. The track from the split put on the WATWTCOTBWOAA compilation sounds nothing like what he describes and I wouldn't be surprised if he's never listened to a single track on the record. I am absolutely certain this review would not have been accepted if Zodijackyl wasn't a mod. |
Author: | droneriot [ Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:03 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Zodijackyl isn't a mod. |
Author: | Metantoine [ Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
He's not a site mod, he's an enforcer for the Musicians forums, this review was approved by another mod. |
Author: | Cendelence [ Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
My bad. |
Author: | Metantoine [ Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Hummmmmmm, ok, I'll check that out little by little. I'll need a new axe after this though. Edit: Gunther is also busy, I'll edit the post with his nukes too. |
Author: | Grave_Wyrm [ Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Zodijackyl wrote: Alright, that's enough for now. Holy ... f***in .. that list is INTENSE. wow. |
Author: | GuntherTheUndying [ Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
You're breaking my balls Zodi. |
Author: | Metantoine [ Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
God, Zodi wants my death. This will take some time. |
Author: | Zodijackyl [ Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
The vast majority of those are really bad. Some of them, like the Ebony Tears one, are serviceable as they're the only review for the album, but are a poor description of the music - I'm writing reviews of the Ebony Tears albums now, since they deserve a better description. |
Author: | BastardHead [ Fri Sep 14, 2012 12:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Okay, let's not get overzealous here. I haven't checked any yet but if I find even one that is just mediocre and not outright offensively wretched, I'm going to ignore the rest, blackball you, and maybe even mail you some anthrax. |
Author: | Zodijackyl [ Fri Sep 14, 2012 12:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
BastardHead wrote: Okay, let's not get overzealous here. I haven't checked any yet but if I find even one that is just mediocre and not outright offensively wretched, I'm going to ignore the rest, blackball you, and maybe even mail you some anthrax. Oh no, I heard listening to Stomp 442 can kill you! You don't want to kill me, do you? |
Author: | BastardHead [ Fri Sep 14, 2012 12:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
When you dump sixtyish reviews on me (I can't be fucked to count for real, I'm bitter from a very shitty Bears loss right now), yes, death is a good option. People, do not take inspiration from Zodi here. If you see things that need gone, by all means mention them. But if you drop a nuclear deuce like this I'm going to let them all sit out of fucking spite. |
Author: | Metantoine [ Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
I was talking to Zodi and I agreed with this plan, I wasn't expecting this many reviews though Yeah, don't take Zodi as a role model, he was acting as my counselor or some sort... All the reviews of Demon of the fall were deleted, except 1 or 2, I believe, his Morningrise review is alright, I edited some parts of it though. |
Author: | oogboog [ Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Looks like you guys have some work to do . You guys might want to check this review, though. The guy only describes the vocals (and not even adequately ). I know that's the only review for the album, but I think it could really go. |
Author: | Metantoine [ Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Bad review and.......it's gone! |
Author: | Wilytank [ Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/N ... Placidity3 http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/O ... Placidity3 Bare description and quite a few misspellings. Also, "let the metal flow"; the hell did this come from? |
Author: | Metantoine [ Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Keep them coming, I won't comment for each post. |
Author: | Zodijackyl [ Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Metantoine wrote: Keep them coming, I won't comment for each post. Here's a few more. Mostof them are so poorly written that they don't even need much of a comment. This one either needs serious editing or removal. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/M ... 093/Rhaven Track-by-track with little music description. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/M ... Brownstone Another run-on track-by-track. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/M ... rrenschiff The formatting on this one is fucked up, but it's all track-by-track with minor digressions. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/M ... Brownstone Crappy TBT, PseudoGoatKill wrote a much better review that goes into detail on these descriptions. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/M ... 3/Silmaril I think this one predates the "Tell us about the music. Tell us about the music!" guideline. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/D ... 2266/Ghost Talks about what the music isn't, but the few details mentioned describe the music very poorly. Mentions some minor details, leaves out the main picture. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/D ... lackEnergy Very short on descriptions. The first two paragraphs manage to recount a personal experience and say everything is great, so there's only about five sentences of description. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/D ... waytonever The format of this one seems to pad very minimal descriptions with names and song titles. It barely explains the album. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/D ... /prometeus This one seems to use the wrong words to describe the music: "Alexi's amazingly brutal vocals" + "self-mutilation" + "standard drum machine rhythm" describing the homage to Carcass' Corporeal Jigsaw Quandary http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/C ... 5/OSheaman Glosses over main points for type-casting track-by-track. Uses lots of words to say very little. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/C ... hadowsfall http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/N ... /Goatsbane Yep, 2004 reviews. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/N ... hadowsfall How many times can you say "it's not Children of Bodom" in a dozen lines? http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... Till_Death Finish? Technical? http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... /ThePharao This one has a few sentences about the music, but just as many sentences reminding us that they aren ot Children of Bodom. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... on_Thunder Track-by-track with little about the music. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... d/1957/Guy More comparisons to Children of Bodom than other descriptions of the music http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... gingcorpse Oh boy. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... 59/Chuckus TBT that has a lot of little descriptions but nothing about the album as a whole, which I suppose is the problem with the format. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... InAFireBox You could fit a more complete review in a tweet. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... ormcrusher Once again, this one gets hung up on Children of Bodom, and it's very minimal. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... yPhalluses Tell us about the music? http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... 92/Diamhea It's heavier than Children of Bodom, the vocalist does a great job, oh fuck, not this again. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... hrashAD720 "My guess is they got sick of people comparing them to Children of Bodom. If this is the case, they succeeded because TBW doesn’t sound much like COB at all. Now that I got the bitter out of the way lets get to the sweet. This album must have been recorded and mastered by Jesus Christ himself because it sounds nothing short of miraculous." http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... 26/aris801 So many adjectives, so little coherent meaning. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... nd_Vitriol "It is soo evil sounding. When I listen to it I feel like brutally raping a priest then nailing him to an inverted cross. Oh geeeze. It’s got some serious bottom end to it. " "He even designed his own guitar shaped like an Inverted cross. (If u haven’t seen a pic of it yet, check out Yavcon’s website. It looks awesome.)" http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/V ... _MoRTiCiAN "His inverted cross means nothing since he's probably not a satanist and it's fucking stupid anyway. The lyrics are just that- stupid. Everything revolves around the death of Christ, and destroying Christinaity, the same thing we hear every goddamn day. I gotta admit, they did give it a bit more flare here, though. Using more 'complex' words, so to speak, made it not the same "RORO SATAN" shit- an interesting twist that didn't quite save it anyway." Full of typos too. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/V ... 895/AzzMan "When I listen to this CD I picture myself in a pimpin’ old skool pink Cadillac cruising down some desert highway at night, with a double bass in the back seat and a pair of bitchin’ dark sunglasses on, looking up at the starry night and thinking to myself. “Damn, I need one of those psychedelic blue drinks you always see in movies.” (You know the one that comes in a ridiculously large glass with a bunch of miniature umbrellas in it.) Listening to this reminds me of that Simpson’s episode when Homer eats the insanity peppers and is lost in the bizarre hallucinogenic desert." http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... _MoRTiCiAN This sounds like a review by Nathan Explosion of Dethklok. Brutal brutal brutal! http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/C ... _MoRTiCiAN "What makes this record so damn good is the sound." Really? I thought it was the logo. This review is just bad. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/M ... _MoRTiCiAN Half of this short review is speculation about how the drums were recorded. What is this, ...And Justice For All? http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/V ... arkandfoul "One of my only problems with the album is the tendency to use some rather silly lyrics at times, but unlike most metal-people, I tend to believe that Benton really does hate this god-guy, making it acceptable." Great quote, terrible review otherwise. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/V ... Herbstleyd Horribly formatted, with each sentence being a new line but no line breaks. Either a candidate for editing/formatting or deletion. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/V ... Herbstleyd This one is very minimal, but the writing is decent. It seems like it was cut off in the middle of the review. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/V ... brocashelm Terrible writing. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/V ... hterofSoul Nothing about the music. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/V ... 6628/ozzeh Aside from being short on description, this sentence is poorly phrased as it is describing the albums that came after this one. "Gone are the superfluous elements which are contained in "Decristianize" & "Icons of Evil", replaced with a more streamlined, down-tuned fundamental death metal riffing sound-structure. " http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/V ... 2409/ozzeh No musical description other than the song lengths/structures. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/V ... 16/Niflhel Little musical description, and mostly in relation to the previous album. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/V ... e_Terrible |
Author: | Zodijackyl [ Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Sorry to post so many at once, but I've been doing a lot of reading and these are all strong candidates for deletion. Nothing about the music. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/B ... teve112sms Most of the review is explaining that he does not like the album, not why he doesn't like it. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/B ... ySonicDiet Very poorly written. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/B ... /WIndrider Poor grammar and doesn't get much beyond using genre labels to describe it. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/B ... eofsilence Sounds like typical black metal, just like Dissection? Minimal and misleadingly poor description of the music. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/N ... 7/ratsalad I know it's the only review for this album, but it's terrible. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/B ... 6/ratsalad I could've written better than this before hearing the album. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/A ... 9/ratsalad So it's death/thrash, and... nvm thats all. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/N ... 1807/cweed Certainly a remnant of the past. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/N ... 1807/Snxke This one spends more time talking about other bands and almost none describing the album being reviewed. It's also not post-black metal. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/N ... 877/Minion This is either terrible or amazing, I'm not sure which. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/N ... 1/Erin_Fox Low content track-by-track. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/N ... /Pyosified Rambling overview. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/T ... 1261/cweed Really bare. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/T ... 4/multocco There's probably an acceptable amount of musical description here, but it's stretched out with a lot of filler as track-by-track descriptions. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/T ... 24/ict1523 Probably a bit too minimal. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/O ... /The_Ghoul A glance at this one should tell you enough. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/O ... /Decarabia I think this one is expendable too. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/O ... fth_Figure I don't trust a one-inch review of Windir that mentions "breakdowns". http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/W ... fth_Figure Typical problems with a TBT. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/W ... /Laraque27 Almost no musical description. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/W ... errorsatan A few more crappy old reviews. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/W ... s_the_kvlt http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/W ... 2/Wikingus http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/W ... darkFLAMES And now, some choice quotes from terrible reviews! "All too often, however, they merely make use of a gregorian chant style thing, which just sounds like bad keyboards. Hell, maybe it is." http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/B ... 4/ratsalad "Nieve and retarded was I." http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/B ... oodandIron "So, let's play a little game again. Band comes from Sweden. Logo is hardly decipherable, even when you know what it means (even though it looks pretty cool). On the cover we see a Viking, his sword in the air and in the background dragonships. What does this tell us? So, all of you, who yell Viking Metal get a bonus-point. THYRFING allegedly is a mythic sword and these young Swedish folks have fully taken on the Vikings in their lyrics. My way to this debut has been pretty weird. I had been talking to a label-boss, who would some time later completely vanish from everywhere (Invasion Records), and he mentioned THYRFING as interesting band before the line crashed and my phone fell into a day-long coma. Well, after many calls and shop-visits I finally held it in my hands..." http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/T ... g/1260/DcB "Borknagar is not a band for people who are just looking for chaotic noise and pointless screaming (otherwise known as your average death metal or black metal or hardcore fan). It's not surprising that some headbashing, pit moshing kids would pick up a CD like this and complain about how much they hate progressive metal - a lot of these people are just plainly against the entire concept of progress... which is somewhat irrelevent, as Borknagar is viking/folk metal, not prog. If you are an intellectual connoisseur of fine metal, you should definitely like this CD. Listening through it is like roaming through the woods surrounding a medieval castle... if you are a fan of viking metal or folk metal, you know what I mean. The songs vary in key, tempo, and vocal style. Vortex is one of the best vocalists in the history of metal." http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/B ... 81/ZuSNick "Some say this album is a classic, though I haven't heard of it for over a year of almost maniacal listening to black metal ... Melodic black metal is rather rare, and this album is the main and probably the best point of taht genre." (written in 2005) http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/N ... 1806/vorth "An all out explosion of Black Metal so fierce and melodic, it would make any Cradle of Filth bandwagon jumper run home to his mommy crying. " http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/N ... 6/ArtOfWar This one deserves to have its full text preserved in all its terribility:
Spoiler:
show
http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/N ... nstro_City |
Author: | Pr0nogo [ Sun Sep 16, 2012 10:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Well shit. |
Author: | TadakatsuH0nda [ Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Zodijackyl wrote: Glosses over main points for type-casting track-by-track. Uses lots of words to say very little. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/C ... hadowsfall Yep, 2004 reviews. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/N ... hadowsfall I find that he has a few other crappy "2004 reviews" too, very short and only arguing one point the entire review. |
Author: | Metantoine [ Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Pr0nogo wrote: Well shit. Watch your language, young man! Also, some of these were rejected, some were fine, don't be too mean, Zodi, the Oven Fodder is for the crappiest ones. |
Author: | Pr0nogo [ Mon Sep 17, 2012 9:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Lol Meta, you've read my reviews. I most certainly do not watch my language. Bahahahaha. |
Author: | Oblarg [ Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/A ... 26371/Lane I realize that when there's only one other review of an album the standards are a bit lower, but really, this is pretty awful. There's next to no actual musical description, the grammar is clunky and awkward, and the whole thing completely fails to impress on the listener what the author actually thinks of the album. |
Author: | Zodijackyl [ Mon Sep 17, 2012 9:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Metantoine wrote: Also, some of these were rejected, some were fine, don't be too mean, Zodi, the Oven Fodder is for the crappiest ones. OK, I now have a much better idea of what and isn't oven fodder. This certainly is: http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/P ... Hellegion' This probably is: http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/V ... /Hellegion This one contradicts itself, describing it as a mix of Emperor and Darkthrone, then not being a Darkthrone clone (it's pretty much a clone of 'A Blaze...') http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... /Hellegion "This opus gives me an erection every time I listen to it." http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/K ... 2/Thorsson |
Author: | Wilytank [ Mon Sep 17, 2012 10:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/B ... hrasher666 Only half of the first paragraph is describing the music. http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/C ... hrasher666 http://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/A ... hrasher666 Only a couple of shreds of music talk. |
Author: | Morrigan [ Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Zodijackyl wrote: Metantoine wrote: Also, some of these were rejected, some were fine, don't be too mean, Zodi, the Oven Fodder is for the crappiest ones. OK, I now have a much better idea of what and isn't oven fodder. Apparently not... Look, if there's a "probably" in there, don't post it here, ok? Most of those are mediocre, but not Oven Fodder worthy. Jesus, how many times do I have to say this... |
Author: | kluseba [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
I really don't mind people deleting old reviews when the standards for the Metal Archives were different in the pioneer era. It's absolutely okay to transform for example old reviews from 2004 or so to oven fodder. This is also okay for reviews that have important factual errors that have not been recognized before, whatever the reason might be. But I think that the more recent reviews that were already judged by the moderators with new rules in mind should not be deleted anymore in general. I think there are way too many severe suppressions these days with people listing up hundreds of reviews that are judged as oven fodder. This feels a little bit like the McCarthyism of the Metal Archives or some sort of Great Purge. I mean it's okay to have standards but one should not reduce the Metal Archives to experienced writers only, native or nearly native (English) speakers or put it up to a too intellectual level. I'm universitarian, too, but we're talking about metal music that should be accessible for anyone. It's not because somebody has some difficulties with English, a rather limited vocabulary or did a couple of mistakes, that his or her review must be deleted. These people might sill have something interesting to say and one should recognize the effort they put in their reviews for this site. I think this deletion mania should slow down a little bit. I'm not really concerned personally and don't have any quarrel but I think people start going a little bit too far on here. By the way: if you delete a review, you should also send a short message to inform the person about it. It's the same thing as if you send a message telling somebody his or her review got accepted. Lately, I just wanted to check out my review for Edguy's "Age Of The Joker" and it had been deleted and I had never been informed about it. My review surely wasn't a masterpiece and it's okay for me to dump it but I would have liked to know about it to improve or to write a new one and I think many people think alike. |
Author: | GuntherTheUndying [ Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
There is no Great Purge. Zodi simply caused a massive clusterfuck here because he posted dull, mediocre reviews instead of truly terrible pieces, which is what the Oven Fodder needs to feed. Also, the notion that this site is practicing "McCarthyism" as you put it, is a little much. Yes, there are standards, but they are not impossibly high. Hell, there are a number of reviews that pass through which are loaded with grammar/spelling errors, Engrish, or whatever you can think of. That's fine, nobody's perfect. The standards have increased, sure, but that's because the overall substance from the reviewers has as well; it's a positive correlation. Still, anyone with a keyboard can write a review. Metal Archives is not becoming an exclusive elite writers club; only a fool would think otherwise. I think posting reviews in bulk as demonstrated above for deletion was a bad idea, but then adding in the question of acceptable/non-acceptable content made it even worse. kluseba, there is nothing to worry about, because the mods are in control and regular joes pretending to have a grasp on which reviews can stay and which can't are kidding themselves. |
Author: | droneriot [ Sun Sep 23, 2012 1:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Yes, mods are truly infallible. That's why this thread exists. Because after their three-year apprenticeship and rigorous standardized testing, mods have the ability of perfect judgement. Anyone who does not realize this indisputable truth is truly kidding themselves. -edit- Just to clarify, I'm not trying to be the new Lippyass and start a revolution, and I have a great deal of respect for the majority of the site staff, it's just that Gunther's statement was really, really pretentious... |
Author: | failsafeman [ Sun Sep 23, 2012 1:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
GuntherTheUndying wrote: Hell, there are a number of reviews that pass through which are loaded with grammar/spelling errors, Engrish, or whatever you can think of. Jesus Christ, I hope you're not accepting reviews loaded with grammar/spelling errors. |
Author: | GuntherTheUndying [ Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Oven Fodder (Provide LINKS, please) |
Haha No, I'm simply saying there are several reviews which have been accepted that have spelling/grammar errors. Perhaps I have should have worded that a bit lighter. My bad. droneriont wrote: Yes, mods are truly infallible. That's why this thread exists. Because after their three-year apprenticeship and rigorous standardized testing, mods have the ability of perfect judgement. Anyone who does not realize this indisputable truth is truly kidding themselves. -edit- Just to clarify, I'm not trying to be the new Lippyass and start a revolution, and I have a great deal of respect for the majority of the site staff, it's just that Gunther's statement was really, really pretentious... Well, that was certainly not my intention to call the mods infallible or appear pretentious. I took kluseba's post as concern for the reviews that were posted for deletion, and I was pointing out that, at the end of the day, reviews posted here aren't all going to be deleted unless they are, indeed, terrible reviews, and that the mods have the final say. There are errors that happen, of course, and no system is perfect. But in retrospect I was in a terribly bad mood yesterday at the time of writing that post (bad excuse, I know) and that last sentence is a little much. Apologizes folks, did not mean to look so arrogant. I'll shut up now. |
Page 185 of 239 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |