k, thanks again
| Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives https://forum.metal-archives.com/ |
|
| Factuality in reviews https://forum.metal-archives.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=94670 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | aloof [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 4:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Factuality in reviews |
what's the policy on that? I don't want to snitch/give away the culprit(s), but let's say -hypothetically- one comes across a review for Metallica's Ride the Lightning, that praises James Hetfield for the solos... what then? |
|
| Author: | Azmodes [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 4:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Factuality in reviews |
Check point 6. |
|
| Author: | aloof [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 4:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Factuality in reviews |
thanks, but I didn't write a review that got rejected. I've read a few accepted ones that made my eyes roll, or at least made me smirk. shall I just contact the reviewer to edit their review, or keep shtum? |
|
| Author: | Azmodes [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 5:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Factuality in reviews |
Nothing wrong with contacting him or her, I guess. You can also post them in one of these threads for mods to deal with: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=7444 viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4153 |
|
| Author: | aloof [ Thu Nov 15, 2012 5:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Factuality in reviews |
k, thanks again
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|