So yeah, that new Burzum review sucks. It's a review of a black metal album as if it was written by someone that doesn't actually listen to black metal. Not surprising since he recommended this thing as a superior listen instead:

Because a band's quality is proportional to how much people liked them 20 years ago.

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/Burzum/Hvis_lyset_tar_oss/413048/Unholy_Darkness_And_Impurity/412669 :/ :/ :/ :/

My trollsense is tingling with that one.

every other loser in black metal has emulated Hvis because it's not hard to play it at all.

Jute Gyte Oviri Jul 13th ... did tomcat_ha listen to this entire thing? I know I didn't. What a mess of a release.

Judging by his post history, Unholy Darkness and Impurity indeed seems like a tryhard tool (not really convinced he's actually 30)

I'd take Havohej over it too.

I hadn't seen the review but my sincere condolences.

Thanks, Emptiness...who apparently isn't completely empty.

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/Havohej/Dethrone_the_Son_of_God/10229/Subrick/237570

Well, I laughed with that punchline.

You know, I have a hard time imagining someone naming a song "The Fucking of Sacred Assholes" and expecting it to be taken 100% seriously...

Would someone please mind letting me know if it is best to wait before I send another one?

They'll get to it when they get to it. If it's rejected, they'll give instructions. Meanwhile, post anything you want to in the Workshop.

Whether or not you wait is up to you. You get a maximum of 5 in the queue at any one time, but that that leads me to a question: if it eventually goes up, will it be a validation to maintain that standard? Is it validation at all? The site criteria are enough to establish a reasonable compositional minimum, and that's all they intend to do. Acceptance isn't necessarily a vote of confidence. Quality, like caution, is up to you.

I was originally talking in the Review Workshop thread a couple of months ago. I am unsure if I am in the correct thread now, but this is on a different subject regarding reviews. I've had a review now, "pending" for almost a month. It got rejected once, but was told to make a correction to it then resubmit it, which I did (this is not really my question, as I am not trying to rush it to be read; but am only bringing this up because of the question I would like to ask, please).

But, in waiting I've been wanting to write 2 more reviews. Even though I've been here since 2006, writing reviews is fairly new to me, and am unsure of what's best to do. Should I wait until my "pending" review gets looked at before I write and submit another one? I don't want to add more, if I indeed should be waiting for my other one to either be rejected, or submitted. Would someone please mind letting me know if it is best to wait before I send another one?

Thank you so much to anyone that will answer me!

Spider_X, from now on let's talk about this sort of thing in the Workshop. It's a general tutoring room and writing lab, so feel free to stop by there with general questions and material.

You can submit the other reviews. There's a lot of pending reviews right now (50-100) and we often skip over the ones that have been previously rejected until all the fresh submissions have been handled.

Your patience is appreciated, though. I should go through the review queue now, I'll look at yours again and skip over the half a dozen Iron Maiden reviews that have been previously rejected.

@Zodijackyl

Since i can't answer directly to your message, i'll do it here.
Thank you for the great handling of my most recent review, your help and feedbacks are greatly appreciated. I always try to do my best to improve my English writting, and help from you and other native speakers is really nice!

I hope i'm not that bad though

I appreciate that! I understand completely Thank you for looking at mine and also accepting it! You're very welcome about the patience, this is why I was wanting to ask, I mean I figured you had alot to look through, and wasn't sure of the process of if I should wait, because I didn't want to add more if that wasn't o.k. to do. Also, thank you for taking the time to talk to me.

Wow, BastardHead gave that album a thrashing.

"Wintersun continues to be this weird bastard hybrid of Nickelback and K-pop. Nickelback because they're not necessarily offensively bad, just really, unbelievably, excessively lame, and K-pop because it all sorta sounds the same and follows an obvious template with very few tricks, but fans are absolutely fucking wild in their unending devotion to mediocrity."

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I don't think he's much a fan of Wintersun.

Wow, BastardHead gave that album a thrashing.

"Wintersun continues to be this weird bastard hybrid of Nickelback and K-pop. Nickelback because they're not necessarily offensively bad, just really, unbelievably, excessively lame, and K-pop because it all sorta sounds the same and follows an obvious template with very few tricks, but fans are absolutely fucking wild in their unending devotion to mediocrity."

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I don't think he's much a fan of Wintersun.

Nevermind the core text, but calling Mikko Salovaara and Kasper Mårtenson nobodies? Well, I had a laugh.

It struck me as rather sedate to be honest; he even admits to being resigned to reviewing it because yelling at Jari is something people now know him for and it comes across in his writing. Be your own man BH, review what you want.