Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives
https://forum.metal-archives.com/

Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)
https://forum.metal-archives.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4153
Page 239 of 239

Author:  robotniq [ Sun Dec 10, 2023 5:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Maybe these ones (all only one paragraph):

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... deX/232519
https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... deX/232519
https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... deX/232519
https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... deX/232519

Author:  colin040 [ Sun Dec 10, 2023 12:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Another hardly-descriptive review.

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... pian/23414

Author:  colin040 [ Tue Dec 19, 2023 4:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

And another one.

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... ique/21147

Author:  Auselesspileofflesh [ Wed Dec 20, 2023 1:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

This review really doesn't go much into the music or riffing itself. Pretty ambiguous


https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... ath/146600

Author:  colin040 [ Sat Dec 23, 2023 12:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... cat/223660

Author:  King_of_Arnor [ Sat Dec 30, 2023 7:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... ght/333724

If this wasn't written by an AI, it doesn't really go beyond the level of detail an AI is capable of, for an album with almost 40 reviews.

Author:  Of_This_Night36 [ Sun Dec 31, 2023 12:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Of_This_Night36 wrote:
I reported this to 2 separate mods in 2021 and 2022, and ALL the reviews are still there.
Image:
Spoiler: show
Image

The user I'm talking about - here
The report where the relation to the label/bands is confirmed - here
"Brother" thing - here
I hate to even bring it up as I kind of know the guy and it was a long time ago, but continuing to have these misleading, self-promoting reviews on the site is ridiculous.
If you need a list of all the bands they're in, just see here in their lineup.

Edit: I may also suggest looking at these two reviews ([here] and [here]). Knowing the intent here was to promote his own label, I find it not-very-coincidental the only two negative reviews he ever wrote were for bands not on his label. ........... And if I may say, I find O Majestic Winter (which he called "defiling the name of black metal") and Ichabod (a release on his label which he called a "masterpiece") to both sound pretty similar to each other......

..............?
Posted this back in August and, again, reports go back to 2021.

Author:  gasmask_colostomy [ Sun Dec 31, 2023 2:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Of_This_Night36 wrote:
Of_This_Night36 wrote:
I reported this to 2 separate mods in 2021 and 2022, and ALL the reviews are still there.
Image:
Spoiler: show
Image

The user I'm talking about - here
The report where the relation to the label/bands is confirmed - here
"Brother" thing - here
I hate to even bring it up as I kind of know the guy and it was a long time ago, but continuing to have these misleading, self-promoting reviews on the site is ridiculous.
If you need a list of all the bands they're in, just see here in their lineup.

Edit: I may also suggest looking at these two reviews ([here] and [here]). Knowing the intent here was to promote his own label, I find it not-very-coincidental the only two negative reviews he ever wrote were for bands not on his label. ........... And if I may say, I find O Majestic Winter (which he called "defiling the name of black metal") and Ichabod (a release on his label which he called a "masterpiece") to both sound pretty similar to each other......

..............?
Posted this back in August and, again, reports go back to 2021.

This is a really complicated issue and I remember looking into it when you posted back in August. The reviews themselves definitely meet the site standard, obviously the tricky thing to work out is which ones are written in good faith and which are not. I'd encourage other review mods to take a look at the situation too, because it certainly has self-promotive elements to the reviewing, just as it stands the body of reviews as a whole sit across a grey area where some may cross the line and others may not.

Author:  VictimOfScience [ Sun Jan 14, 2024 1:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

I'm not sure about the below review. All I learned is that this album's got loud, deep bass, groove, and thrashes "my fucking ass off".

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... id66/61990

Author:  colin040 [ Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Why the hell did this negative review for Necrophobic's The Nocturnal Silence get accepted?
https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... rd/1061580

Reviewer compares Necrophobic to plenty of other bands...but doesn't describe the why their influences work better than the band in question does. Even when the reviewer attempts to describe the band's musicianship, you end up with these superficial descriptions that basically mean nothing.

Quote:
It should have been a simple love story. An atmospheric black/death metal album from the early nineties of Sweden on one side and my easy to impress boyish nature on the other. The scene praises this record with one big voice in unison, the band itself never sold out and the essence of the style itself is hard to mess up. Let's give this a high score and move on, shall we?

No, we absolutely shall the fuck not. Holy christ on a dildo swing, I tried so hard. But after many spins and countless evaluations, this album still pisses me off in a huge way. When compared to other records of the time, it falls short and flat on its face. Can you imagine that Pure Holocaust was released around the same time and unleashed a viscious blizzard of brutality upon the world while this stupid little thing by Necrophobic was bouncing around like a toddler without teeth or brains? I know that it is not always fair to compare one band to another, but in this case I just have to do it. Every threshold of urgent cinematic violence that Necrophobic wanted to cross with this record has already been conquered by Bathory, Morbid Angel and even Slayer long before.

Late to the game and not even aware of it. "The Nocturnal Silence" was hopelessly behind everything and it bores me to death with its thin and slow ways of imitated rebellion. This sounds to me like a second rate cover band without a real vision, only praised because it is old and around long enough for some sort of unearned cult laurels. The riffs are not very brutal or engaging and represent the mediocre standard of the time, the drums with their weak plastic sound and mid range speed do not offer real barbaric beatings and the screams are many steps below the real performances of better wolves and harpies in the neighborhood.

I am sorry, but for a record that rode out to talk about death, darkness and morbid satanic evaluations, this shit just sounds incredibly LAME to me. I could not find a real single moment of compository greatness or biting fury on this album. It just passes me by like a train in the distance. You don't have to be technical as a death/black metal band but it's always obvious when you keep things simple out of necessity, not because you want to but because you can't do it any other way. Darkthrone offered sharp minimalism because it was their will and their pleasure and their passion, Necrophobic on the other hand kept things simple because they lacked options. And I can smell it on them. I can fucking smell it.

In the end, it has to be my fault. Maybe I overlooked something profound and weighty that others found long ago, but I have never discovered the magic and the passion that this record is famed for. I don't like it, I am not moved by it and I don't want to own it. I even hate that lazy cover artwork. Simple minded pricks. Pass.

Author:  Lane [ Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

One from almost 2 decades ago... Not descriptive at all, except that there's keyboards! 3 chapters of which 2 babble about how boring the album is.
https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... Age/27804/

Author:  Antioch [ Tue Jan 30, 2024 1:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Short, has grammar/spelling mistakes, and dwells on a similarity with another band.
https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... onVonK/280

Author:  Slater922 [ Wed Jan 31, 2024 3:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... ilent/7882

Old school review from 2004. Very short at just two paragraphs, and the first one feels more like a YouTube comment rather than an actual review. Even the second paragraph just barely describes the music.

Author:  TheBurningOfSodom [ Wed Jan 31, 2024 5:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Slater922 wrote:
https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/Brodequin/Festival_of_Death/994/Pestilent/7882

Brodequin is indeed on my 'bands to purge' list, the ones that their bulk of reviews being made up of very old write-ups. Will take a gander through their reviews once I come back from holidays. :roll:

Author:  marc1978 [ Fri Feb 02, 2024 5:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/Dead_Head/The_Feast_Begins_at_Dawn/17294/MakeMySandwich/270140

What a turd of a review.
He actually mentions Pantera when most of the songs on Feast were written before post-Power Metal Pantera even became a thing.
The whole review reads as if the writer was drunk or in a very emotional state and not in a sound state of mind.

Author:  Lane [ Fri Feb 02, 2024 10:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

^ Probably written under the influence of 30 bucks of beer...

Author:  colin040 [ Sun Feb 04, 2024 2:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... rio/266200

Reviewer claims that plenty of things of the re-recording are better, but doesn't describe why. Overall, the review reads way too superficial for my taste.

Author:  colin040 [ Thu Feb 08, 2024 6:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... nary/43515

Extremely brief.

Author:  Opus [ Mon Feb 19, 2024 10:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Reading this damn near gave me an aneurysm. Or if the writer had an aneurysm when he wrote it, not sure.

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... nchor41648

Author:  TheBurningOfSodom [ Fri Feb 23, 2024 2:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Ah, the good ol' 'shoehorn famous song/album titles into the writing' shenanigans everyone and their dog found so cool twenty-something years ago :lol:

(Wait, what do you mean all his reviews are like this...?)

Author:  Auselesspileofflesh [ Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Yeah this is a pretty ambiguous review.

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... ick/14019/

Author:  Auselesspileofflesh [ Thu Mar 21, 2024 9:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Another weak review. a very weak desciption on the music which incorrectly likens a technical deathcore band with Suicide Silence & Carnifex; the most well known and meat'n'potatoes deathcore (carnifex at the time of the review)


https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... nce/233335

Author:  morbert [ Mon Mar 25, 2024 1:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

What a turd
https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/Blood/Impulse_to_Destroy/9724/AxlFuckingRose/1355496
Quote:
Following the template that American grindcore pioneers Napalm Death put forward

Excuse me? American?

Apart from being a review bashing a subgenre classic for coolness points and not understanding the basics of the subgenre at all, she/he got their info wrong in the very first sentence already

Author:  colin040 [ Wed Mar 27, 2024 6:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... ero_/12700

Brief!

Author:  Lane [ Thu Apr 04, 2024 3:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

One paragraph shortie, that doesn't tell much about the music itself. There's quite a lot of other kind of drumming than merely blast beats on the album, like the writer thought and repeated it several times.

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... Gate/7518/

Author:  colin040 [ Mon Apr 22, 2024 11:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... adek/92991

Brief!

Author:  colin040 [ Thu Apr 25, 2024 9:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... kyl/113957

Another brief one.

Author:  Sweetie [ Thu Apr 25, 2024 11:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... rm/1887246

How the hell did this get through? Had to be AI.

Author:  DoomMetalAlchemist [ Thu Apr 25, 2024 11:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Sweetie wrote:
https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/Ghost_Bath/Self_Loather/970834/EvigSnostorm/1887246

How the hell did this get through? Had to be AI.


The title of that review should be "In This Album".

Author:  TheBurningOfSodom [ Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Sweetie wrote:
How the hell did this get through? Had to be AI.

Believe it or not, it isn't. I guess the instrument-by-instrument description is still typically human...

DoomMetalAlchemist wrote:
The title of that review should be "In This Album".

Good God, that appears... quite a lot of times.

Author:  robotniq [ Sun Apr 28, 2024 3:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Maybe these four? (all are one brief paragraph)

https://www.metal-archives.com/user-rev ... ordMessiah

Author:  colin040 [ Sun Apr 28, 2024 10:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... lmed/6781/

Should this one remain on the website?

Author:  VictimOfScience [ Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... ss/145764/

Strange formatting, very surface-level, and brief analysis.

Author:  EzraBlumenfeld [ Tue Apr 30, 2024 5:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

https://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/ ... ia/1832084

I know this band and I'm friends with their drummer, this review is riddled with factual inaccuracies and follows a bare-bones track-by-track format. A cursory glance through the band's social media will confirm that they did in fact make their live debut in 2023, but have never toured Europe. And while the title of this album is The Absence, Oak Pantheon is NOT a side project of the band with the same name.

Author:  TheBurningOfSodom [ Wed May 01, 2024 4:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Oof, the track-by-track totally slipped past me, that's what you get for excessive trust, I guess. Sent back with also a link to your post and a request for clarifications. Thanks.

Author:  Sweetie [ Wed May 01, 2024 3:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

TheBurningOfSodom wrote:
Believe it or not, it isn't. I guess the instrument-by-instrument description is still typically human...


Damn. So it's just that terrible?

Author:  TheBurningOfSodom [ Fri May 03, 2024 7:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)

Sweetie wrote:
TheBurningOfSodom wrote:
Believe it or not, it isn't. I guess the instrument-by-instrument description is still typically human...

Damn. So it's just that terrible?

So it would seem, as far as I can understand at least.

Page 239 of 239 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/