Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives

Message board

* FAQ    * Register   * Login 



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.
Author Message Previous topic | Next topic
Derigin
The Mountain Man

Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:25 am
Posts: 5999
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:51 am 
 

So, Canada's Conservative government has just tabled an ambiguous new bill (Bill C-61) on copyright legislation, and I was more or less curious what your thoughts are on it and whether or not you think it will pass?

Among the provisions are issues regarding time shifting (watching TV at a time it isn't supposed to be watched at), private copying of files (possibly even on TiVo and the like), the locking of cellphones, and changing formats by bypassing DRM or locks of that sort (even changing formats where the creator did not want you to do so, as in a copyprotected CD to an MP3). One of the attention grabbers is a $500 fine for each copyrighted file downloaded, and $20,000 for each file uploaded - even if it's on YouTube.

Is this merely a Canadian version of the American Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)? Will it beget the police state that people are worrying about? Is this going too far? If it becomes a law, how enforceable is it? Where does fair use fit into this?

There's also the whole concern over the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a proposed treaty that may be adopted at the next G8 meeting. It would make it so that border officers could search one's laptop, mp3 player and cellphones. In addition to that, it would requires ISPs to notify authorities about copyright violators without warrants, as well as establish its own supranational organization outside of the UN and WIPO to deal with such infringements. Is Bill C-61 a way to placate this, or is it just the beginning? Should we be concerned?

Top
 Profile  
failsafeman
Digital Dictator

Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:45 am
Posts: 11852
Location: In the Arena
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:01 am 
 

That's preposterous. Stealing a CD out of a store could cost you around $250 if you get caught (in the US, anyway), and a CD obviously has way more songs than just one. Plus, it's actually costing the store something. Pirating only costs companies theoretical dollars, and if the "perpetrator" is downloading only for personal use rather than free distribution or illegal sale, I believe the fine should fit the crime.
_________________
MorbidBlood wrote:
So the winner is Destruction and Infernal Overkill is the motherfucking skullcrushing poserkilling satan-worshiping 666 FUCK YOU greatest german thrash record.

Top
 Profile  
picea_mariana
Mallcore Kid

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 7:22 pm
Posts: 11
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:38 pm 
 

Derigin wrote:
There's also the whole concern over the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a proposed treaty that may be adopted at the next G8 meeting. It would make it so that border officers could search one's laptop, mp3 player and cellphones.

That's hilarious, in so many ways. Because its easier to smuggle movies and music on your person than to just upload a copy somewhere and download it after you cross the border? And are they going to triple the amount of border personnel to search everyone's laptops and iPods?

Top
 Profile  
Noobbot
Mors_Gloria + Thesaurus

Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:48 pm
Posts: 344
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:31 pm 
 

picea_mariana wrote:
Derigin wrote:
There's also the whole concern over the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a proposed treaty that may be adopted at the next G8 meeting. It would make it so that border officers could search one's laptop, mp3 player and cellphones.

That's hilarious, in so many ways. Because its easier to smuggle movies and music on your person than to just upload a copy somewhere and download it after you cross the border? And are they going to triple the amount of border personnel to search everyone's laptops and iPods?


If this is all true, then the next time I go to Niagara Falls or Ontario I'm fucked. :O

Top
 Profile  
InfernoNecrosis
Metal newbie

Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 12:57 pm
Posts: 209
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:02 pm 
 

RegularK showed me an article about this today. All I can say is: Canada needs to stop trying to be America.
_________________
Join Sonic Nexus today for metal/industrial/rock, alternative and other awesomeness.

Top
 Profile  
reconcile
Metal newbie

Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 34
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:49 pm 
 

failsafeman wrote:
That's preposterous. Stealing a CD out of a store could cost you around $250 if you get caught (in the US, anyway), and a CD obviously has way more songs than just one. Plus, it's actually costing the store something. Pirating only costs companies theoretical dollars, and if the "perpetrator" is downloading only for personal use rather than free distribution or illegal sale, I believe the fine should fit the crime.


Excellent point.

Top
 Profile  
Noobbot
Mors_Gloria + Thesaurus

Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:48 pm
Posts: 344
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:46 pm 
 

InfernoNecrosis wrote:
RegularK showed me an article about this today. All I can say is: Canada needs to stop trying to be America.


Not just Canada, but Americans as well. Most intellectual property laws are beyond absurdity.

Top
 Profile  
LordOfTerror
Metal newbie

Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 7:33 pm
Posts: 267
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 3:34 am 
 

These types of laws are absurd, unenforceable, and ineffective. Are they really going to go searching people's homes to make sure he isn't keeping a collection of TV shows on VHS? Are they going to search everyone's Ipod for evidence that the mp3's were not ripped from a CD or legally downloaded, but gotten off of a P2P service?

Top
 Profile  
failsafeman
Digital Dictator

Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:45 am
Posts: 11852
Location: In the Arena
PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 3:40 am 
 

It's just a scare tactic, and I'm sure there will be a handful of widely publicized arrests used to make examples. For 99.99% of all Canadian pirates, though, it will be business as usual.
_________________
MorbidBlood wrote:
So the winner is Destruction and Infernal Overkill is the motherfucking skullcrushing poserkilling satan-worshiping 666 FUCK YOU greatest german thrash record.

Top
 Profile  
WarriorsDawn
Metal newbie

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:24 am
Posts: 64
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 4:17 am 
 

LordOfTerror wrote:
These types of laws are absurd, unenforceable, and ineffective. Are they really going to go searching people's homes to make sure he isn't keeping a collection of TV shows on VHS? Are they going to search everyone's Ipod for evidence that the mp3's were not ripped from a CD or legally downloaded, but gotten off of a P2P service?


I actually heard that they were also making it illegal to have ripped CD's/DVD's on your laptop/MP3 Player/Cell phone. So, unless you download everything from the iTunes store, then you're fucked.

Top
 Profile  
LordOfTerror
Metal newbie

Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 7:33 pm
Posts: 267
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 6:08 am 
 

WarriorsDawn wrote:
LordOfTerror wrote:
These types of laws are absurd, unenforceable, and ineffective. Are they really going to go searching people's homes to make sure he isn't keeping a collection of TV shows on VHS? Are they going to search everyone's Ipod for evidence that the mp3's were not ripped from a CD or legally downloaded, but gotten off of a P2P service?


I actually heard that they were also making it illegal to have ripped CD's/DVD's on your laptop/MP3 Player/Cell phone. So, unless you download everything from the iTunes store, then you're fucked.


Will it be illegal to play them in your stereo, too? Or keep them in a CD binder? Stereos are negatively impacting sales, as are CD binders. I'll explain why: when consumers listen to CD's on stereos, they realize what asinine crap record labels are putting out today. They won't want to buy a CD ever again. When a consumer puts the CD in a binder, they discard the booklet, cover, back cover, etc.-in other words, the image. Without the image, the consumer has no reason to come back to the product, or the industry. We have to think of the artists in this situation-music is hurting their sales. They need to eat off solid gold plates too.

Top
 Profile  
picea_mariana
Mallcore Kid

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 7:22 pm
Posts: 11
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 6:15 am 
 

If you read the OP carefully, you'll see its not just about Canada:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Count ... _Agreement

"...the United States, the European Commission, Japan, Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Canada, and Mexico."

Top
 Profile  
Bezerko
Vladimir Poopin

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:50 am
Posts: 4370
Location: Venestraya
PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 7:10 am 
 

So, if I'm reading this correctly, it will be completely illegal for me to rip any CDs I have ALREADY PAYED FOR onto my computer? I can't listen to music on here anymore even though I've payed for it?

Insanity.

Top
 Profile  
imb
Mallcore Kid

Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 9:32 pm
Posts: 24
PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:41 am 
 

It's not unreasonable for people to want to protect intellectual property and I'm sure those that have written the legislation know that in order to deter there has to be severe punishment. Unfortunately it's pretty evident that this legislation has been drawn up by people who don't live in the real world, rather the well off elite. Pretty much everyone trades copyrighted music, it's so widespread and those that do it don't regard it as morally wrong due to the extortionate prices of CDs and so on. You can't destroy people's lives with such ridiculously large fines over something so petty.

Top
 Profile  
picea_mariana
Mallcore Kid

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 7:22 pm
Posts: 11
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 5:26 pm 
 

imb wrote:
Unfortunately it's pretty evident that this legislation has been drawn up by people who don't live in the real world, rather the well off elite.

I'm sure we all saw that video where Bush was showing off his iPod a few months back. He had non- iTunes material on there including the Beatles. Did he even realize he was breaking the law? That's how out of touch politicians are.

Top
 Profile  
failsafeman
Digital Dictator

Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:45 am
Posts: 11852
Location: In the Arena
PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 6:44 pm 
 

imb wrote:
It's not unreasonable for people to want to protect intellectual property and I'm sure those that have written the legislation know that in order to deter there has to be severe punishment. Unfortunately it's pretty evident that this legislation has been drawn up by people who don't live in the real world, rather the well off elite. Pretty much everyone trades copyrighted music, it's so widespread and those that do it don't regard it as morally wrong due to the extortionate prices of CDs and so on. You can't destroy people's lives with such ridiculously large fines over something so petty.

Rather, the law seems drawn up as if it were targeting people who are illegally downloading files for further illegal distribution for profit, i.e. bootlegging, in which case there would be some justification for the high fines. However, pirating for personal use is a much, much, much less serious crime. The fine should be something like $1 a song.
_________________
MorbidBlood wrote:
So the winner is Destruction and Infernal Overkill is the motherfucking skullcrushing poserkilling satan-worshiping 666 FUCK YOU greatest german thrash record.

Top
 Profile  
Bezerko
Vladimir Poopin

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:50 am
Posts: 4370
Location: Venestraya
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:48 am 
 

failsafeman wrote:
imb wrote:
It's not unreasonable for people to want to protect intellectual property and I'm sure those that have written the legislation know that in order to deter there has to be severe punishment. Unfortunately it's pretty evident that this legislation has been drawn up by people who don't live in the real world, rather the well off elite. Pretty much everyone trades copyrighted music, it's so widespread and those that do it don't regard it as morally wrong due to the extortionate prices of CDs and so on. You can't destroy people's lives with such ridiculously large fines over something so petty.

Rather, the law seems drawn up as if it were targeting people who are illegally downloading files for further illegal distribution for profit, i.e. bootlegging, in which case there would be some justification for the high fines. However, pirating for personal use is a much, much, much less serious crime. The fine should be something like $1 a song.


That's still a few grand for most of us. :|

Top
 Profile  
Kvisling
Metal newbie

Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 12:17 am
Posts: 78
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 4:59 am 
 

Bezerko wrote:
failsafeman wrote:
imb wrote:
It's not unreasonable for people to want to protect intellectual property and I'm sure those that have written the legislation know that in order to deter there has to be severe punishment. Unfortunately it's pretty evident that this legislation has been drawn up by people who don't live in the real world, rather the well off elite. Pretty much everyone trades copyrighted music, it's so widespread and those that do it don't regard it as morally wrong due to the extortionate prices of CDs and so on. You can't destroy people's lives with such ridiculously large fines over something so petty.

Rather, the law seems drawn up as if it were targeting people who are illegally downloading files for further illegal distribution for profit, i.e. bootlegging, in which case there would be some justification for the high fines. However, pirating for personal use is a much, much, much less serious crime. The fine should be something like $1 a song.


That's still a few grand for most of us. :|


They could only charge you for stuff you theoretically stole from them. No Canadian record company has the copyright on that eastern european black metal demo band you downloaded fifty songs of.
_________________
Annihilate Folk, Pagan, and Viking Metal! Join the MA Anti-Folk Metal Front!
Member #1 of the AFMF: You are with us or against us!!!! ,,|,

Top
 Profile  
Silencia
Metal newbie

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 12:24 pm
Posts: 108
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:20 am 
 

Well I do hope that this gets defeated in the House of Commons. From the CBC report it sounds as if there is enough opposition to it. Is anyone going to bother writing to their local MPs?

Top
 Profile  
SupremeAbstract
Metal newbie

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 1:51 pm
Posts: 122
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:37 am 
 

Kvisling wrote:
Bezerko wrote:
failsafeman wrote:
imb wrote:
It's not unreasonable for people to want to protect intellectual property and I'm sure those that have written the legislation know that in order to deter there has to be severe punishment. Unfortunately it's pretty evident that this legislation has been drawn up by people who don't live in the real world, rather the well off elite. Pretty much everyone trades copyrighted music, it's so widespread and those that do it don't regard it as morally wrong due to the extortionate prices of CDs and so on. You can't destroy people's lives with such ridiculously large fines over something so petty.

Rather, the law seems drawn up as if it were targeting people who are illegally downloading files for further illegal distribution for profit, i.e. bootlegging, in which case there would be some justification for the high fines. However, pirating for personal use is a much, much, much less serious crime. The fine should be something like $1 a song.


That's still a few grand for most of us. :|


They could only charge you for stuff you theoretically stole from them. No Canadian record company has the copyright on that eastern european black metal demo band you downloaded fifty songs of.


Exactly. I dare labels such as No Colours or Deathlike Silence Productions to come after me for pirating Nargaroth or Burzum.

Hell, I dare Quorthon's daddy to come after me for not asking for permission to record 13 Candles and sell it for profit!
_________________
Fight the depressive 'black metal' menace. Listen to something that isn't ambient shit.
www.myspace.com/blacklordofstorms
www.nokturnaltransmissionsrecords.com
www.rustyaxerecords.com

Top
 Profile  
orionmetalhead
Metalhead

Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 2327
Location: United States
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:50 pm 
 

Its unfeasible to attempt to enforce this anyway against personal users. Agree with FSM about the fines too. Way too excessive. If this law goes through however and more countries jump on board, the law could retain the significance of a "global copyright law" in which case, those bands from other countries who get caught downloading music produced in other countries and under other country's copyright laws might be able to be persecuted wherever they are in the world. A law like this could lead to such things. Frightening.

Putting your OWN cds into your OWN computer library being illegal? Fuck, thats most ridiculous thing I ever heard.
_________________
CONTAMINATED TONES - BLOG/LABEL/DISTRO
Facebook

Top
 Profile  
~Guest 186985
Metal newbie

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 7:21 pm
Posts: 168
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 12:53 pm 
 

Thank god this didn't pass. I hate Stephen Harper.

Top
 Profile  
thrashmaniac111
Metal newbie

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:26 pm
Posts: 172
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:00 pm 
 

kneeltothecross wrote:
Thank god this didn't pass. I hate Stephen Harper.

This shouldn't turn into a Canadian political thread, but I really don't understand how he got elected.
_________________
Starfox1701A wrote:
A condom is like the government because it allows for inflation, halts production, destroys the next generation, protects a bunch of pricks, gives you a sense of security while you're actually being screwed, and breaks when you most need it.

Top
 Profile  
~Guest 186985
Metal newbie

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 7:21 pm
Posts: 168
PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:00 pm 
 

Did anything happen with this?

Top
 Profile  
evig
Metal newbie

Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:23 am
Posts: 43
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:22 am 
 

The latest I've heard on it was that from July until 13 September/09, the government opened up a public consultation on copyright laws and how they affect society. There were "town hall meetings" across the country & Canadians were able to submit comments and concerns about the bill.

As far as I remember, Tony Clement said the original projected date for implementing the bill was December 11 of this year, but it will likely be next year. As of last month, it hadn't even been properly drafted.

Top
 Profile  
ngwoo
Metalhead

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 531
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:04 pm 
 

kneeltothecross wrote:
Did anything happen with this?


The bill died with the election.

Top
 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

 
Jump to:  

Back to the Encyclopaedia Metallum


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group