oneyoudontknow's profile

I have a magazine and this would be the latest edition:
http://www.archive.org/details/ADeadSpotOfLight...Number18
(review and interview requests are possible. Feel free to ask)

NOTE:
Just because my reviews are posted on the Metal Archives and publicly available, does not mean that any shop or label can post them on their site! In case you want to use them, feel free to contact me.

NOTE2:
I do not upload music ... so do not even ask me about such stuff.

- Reviews: contact me (physical releases are prefered over MP3s)
I prefer to write on bands from small scenes.


Ratings:

100: unique
90-99: excellent
80-89: very good
70-79: good
60-69: not good, not bad
50-59: average
40-49: mediocre
30-39: worthy of improvement
20-29: bad
10-19: very bad
01-09: poor... really
00: Whatever you did, please do the world a favor and do it NEVER again.

to give you an idea how to interpret the ratings of my reviews.

Track-rating-system:
(---;--;-;0;+;++;+++)
I started to use a rating system of the songs in order to express my feelings towards the music in a better and proper way. Words are still important factor in a review, but some nice short 'graphic' can sometimes be useful when it comes to distil the thoughts the writer wants to express in a short and handy form. Anyhow, this kind of rating will be applied on full-lengths only or on demos with a lot of tracks, whereby it would be able to emphasize certain weaknesses and strengths of an album properly. It should not be understood in the way that (+++) in one album can be compared to (+++) of another one. It is limited to this one album only and I use it as a support of my arguments and my criticism.

Deleted Reviews:
... too many to mention them all.