without Internet Explorer,
in 1280 x 960 resolution
My review rating system (numbering is a bit odd):
93-100%: Absolute masterpiece. Very few flaws, one of the top classics of its respective genre.
85-92%: Great album. Top-tier stuff, some flaws but not enough to detract much from the album. Essential for fans of the subgenre.
75-84%: Solid album. Not great, either all of the material is merely solid or the album is uneven. Worth hearing for fans of the subgenre.
65-74%: Decent album. Some redeeming qualities, but the flaws are significant enough that the album isn't worth hearing in full.
51-64%: Mediocre album. There may be a few redeeming qualities but if so the flaws are bad to the point that most or all of the album is unlistenable.
26-50%: Garbage. No redeeming qualities, and there have to be flaws that put it below even the most mediocre of albums. Not worth hearing at all for any reason.
0-25%: Pure aural agony. Listening to the album for any length of time is actively painful. Egregiously bad in multiple facets.