Well I'm here just to complain, first of all you are my main source of research on Internet and I admire your work so much. But your criterion for what could be posted on a review is just NONSENSE. I write for two years for an important Aussie site, have reviewed more than 100 bands since 2009, have interviewed artists such as BURZUM (check out in his OFFICIAL SITE: http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/2012_ ... fuck.shtml
Also, I have interviewed bands such Cryptosy, Master, and have my reviews of bands such BORKNAGAR featuring on their official page, and when I write something for your site do you dare to say I'm an amateur????
Honestly, the reviewers of you site are mongoloid 16-year-olds who think they are true enough to beat a guy who is 20 + years in the heavy metal game.
Apart of this, everything is perfect, keep the good work, I'm a great fan.
Your reviews are retard, that's it.
Just letting off some steam, I hope you understand and put PROFESSIONAL writers to judge what is wrong and to explain the points without beating around the bush to your loyal followers.
The reason I was writing was just to spread the word of my own work. I don't judge myself the king of metal, but as everyone else, I'd like to be read. I'll search and FIND other sources to spread the word of my work.
Stay in the game, long live Metal as Fuck!