Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives

Message board

* FAQ    * Register   * Login 



Reply to topic
Author Message Previous topic | Next topic
inhumanist
Metal freak

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 5:09 pm
Posts: 5634
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:00 pm 
 

Kant is a difficult read indeed, I wouldn't be surprised if the english translation is actually more accessible than the original German texts I had to read. Never ending sentences and consequent use of academic terminology. I think I got most of his moral philosophy but my memory is full of holes. Anyways, the categorical imperative is a pointless attempt to justify christian moralism imo.
_________________
Under_Starmere wrote:
iHumanism: Philosophy phoned in.
Metantoine wrote:
If Summoning is the sugar of fantasy metal, is Manowar the bacon?

Top
 Profile  
~Guest 58624
Metalhead

Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 4:33 am
Posts: 649
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:48 pm 
 

Thanks for the feedback, guys. :)

Top
 Profile  
PhantomGreen
Metalhead

Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 7:27 pm
Posts: 1226
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:20 pm 
 

FlaPack wrote:
Markov wrote:
I'm looking for a novel that incorporates extremely graphic details on "eye-opening" parts of the story, a hooking story that has a lot of philosophy influence, and preferably historical.

Please not another "THE MIND OF [INSERT-X SERIAL KILLER HERE]" book.


Blood Meridian maybe.

ETA: Maybe not that philosophical but the Judge has some great lines. It's certainly a graphic historical novel with a horrifying story.

I have to say that's a wonderful rec. McCarthy is brilliant, and blood meridian is violent disturbing and profound it will stick with you for days upon finishing. The judge character is just perfectly fucked up in every way.
_________________
Lord_Jotun wrote:
Not even an army of chameleons could provide enough eye-rolling to respond to this load of bovine excrement.

mea navis aëricumbens anguillis abundat

Top
 Profile  
andersbang
Metalhead

Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:28 am
Posts: 1069
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:34 pm 
 

FlaPack wrote:
Markov wrote:
I'm looking for a novel that incorporates extremely graphic details on "eye-opening" parts of the story, a hooking story that has a lot of philosophy influence, and preferably historical.

Please not another "THE MIND OF [INSERT-X SERIAL KILLER HERE]" book.


I thoroughly third Blood Meridian; it's my favorite book, very violent and graphic, but McCarthy's language is just, well, wonderfull.

I'll also mention The Kindly Ones by Littel that fits Markov's request. It's about an SS officer in the Sonderkommandos behind the Wehrmacht lines on the Eastern Front and filled with graphic details both psychological (he has personal issues concerning homosexuality and incest as well as broader psychological issues from the whole, you know, exterminating people thingamajing) and of course a lot of gore, what with him being an SS officer and all. Finally a lot of 'philosofical' thoughts justificating his and the Nazi's work.

Top
 Profile  
Ricardo72
Mallcore Kid

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:19 am
Posts: 6
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 1:11 pm 
 

I've been reading the The Rise and Fall of Third Reich by William L. Shirer, which is an accessible, edifying, though biased, narrative of WW2. I think it was one of the first books of its kind to be published after the war, when resentment against Germany was still strong, so the author's condescension while talking about ordinary german people can become rather tiresome after a while.

Anyone know of any similar books worth reading? I'm going to start Winston Churchill's History of World War 2 next and then focus on narrower parts of WW2 military history, as I'm new to the subject and need to get a better overview of it first.

Top
 Profile  
Calusari
Metalhead

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:36 am
Posts: 792
Location: Australia
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:43 am 
 

I realise I am rather late to the game, but I can never resist commenting when Kant-related posts are made on here, so I'd just like to add my voice to those commending megalowho for the summary; that is pretty much the gist of it in my view, too, so well played!

This is a long question and a long reply, so I'm using spoiler tags to reduce the size of my post and only inflict having to read all of what I'm rambling about on people who want to read it...
HumanWaste5150 wrote:
Spoiler: show
Firstly, sorry for misspelling Calurasi :P,
i have not gotten to read any Agamben yet but I do have homo sacer lined up in my very long nonfiction list. The Brandom guy reminds me of Charles Taylor to an extent from that description. I'll take a look when I get a chance although philosophy of mind is a bit farther than what i usually delve into for philosophy.

Yeah, I guess I could have been in the same boat as you in terms of learning environment. My undergraduate school was known to be a hotbed for critical and contitental thought in a very Anglophone style environment (probably the only school in the biggest english province that regularly teaches Nietzche, Castoriadis, Heidegger, Schmitt, Foucault, among others). I consider myself moreso a "continental" both in my research interests and orientation (although I am not a philosophy major) and I find the most important thing for the "school" is that it has to be able to actually respond to criticisms of outsiders and learn to find interlocutors that are willing to get past ad hominem attacks (apparently, most analytic apostles still haven't stopped laughing over the Sokal affair :lol:) . It basically has to learn to be less indulgent and focus moreso on gaining purchase in the opposing schools. I know dudes like Habermas and Dreyfus have done such things but its too uncommon I fear. In other words, thinkers from both sides have to learn to shake the devil's hands. hehe, Perhaps we will have to return to our common link of Frege and/or Husserl to do so.

If you don't mind me asking, are you an adjunct/grad student? if so, I'm curious to hear about what you are specifically researching (if you would rather not/ or use pm instead, i understand).


Spoiler: show
In my view, you're definitely right in comparing Brandom to Taylor - Brandom's reading of Hegel draws pretty heavily on the latter's work, especially about modernity and the relation between individual and communal norms. They respond to each other's work quite a bit, especially with respect to debates with another US philosopher, John McDowell (really interesting guy, also incorporates elements from the continental side into his philosophy of mind), and their discussions of phenomenology (Taylor has that whole 'preconceptual background' reading of Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty, Brandom & McDowell try to argue that those two phenomenologists' views can be reconciled with the notion that all experience is wholly conceptually structured. Really interesting stuff, in my view; I tend to rabbit on about it, though, so sorry!) If you're interested in reading more about him, I'd really recommend Brandom's "Tales of the Mighty Dead", which collects - among other interesting essays - works that summarise his views about Hegel (and Heidegger, actually), and represents one really intriguing example of a work that really connects the 'continental' and analytic traditions.

Re research environments, I agree that we're basically in the same boat. Even though I did my undergrad in anglophone surrounds that really emphasised the analytic tradition, I was able to take courses about existentialism, phenomenology, hermeneutics, Foucault, Nietzsche, Hegel, and even Derrida (who seems to scare many philosophy departments), etc. Even when the number of these courses decreased, especially at higher year levels, I was lucky to be able to continue this interest through my other major (social theory, which basically combines Marxist scholarship, psychoanalysis, structuralism & post-structuralism, post-colonianials studies, gender studies, etc). The department at which I am now also has a very strong tendency to employ people whose research straddles or challenges the continental/analytic boundary. Honestly, though, I was glad to also learn about the analytic side of things; I'm very interested in the philosophy of mind and of language, and it's also useful to be able to communicate with people focussing on things like logic and metaphysics. I whole-heartedly agree with your comments about the 'division' between the schools. In my there is far less of a distinction than the false caricatures of either side (anal-retentive systematic logician trying to reduce the world to equations vs. mad, wannabe-bohemian spouting nonsensical performative poetry about otherness) make out, and people need to get beyond straw-man attacks to learn from one another and recognise the ability of the other discourse to proffer genuine insights that are worthy of serious, respectful debate.

Oh, and re your question - yep, I'm a graduate student; I'm currently working on a doctoral thesis about phenomenological views about how we experience the world primarily through practical (rather than theoretical) engagement with it. It's actually kind of related to the whole analytic/continental thing; I'm focussing mainly on the early Heidegger, but am also exploring how writers like Dreyfus, Taylor, Brandom and others have interpreted 'classic' phenomenological accounts, and how both the older texts and their newer interpretations are being drawn upon in recent debates about the structures of human experience/perception in the philosophy of mind.

Top
 Profile  
~Guest 58624
Metalhead

Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 4:33 am
Posts: 649
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 2:42 pm 
 

Thanks, Calusari.

Calusari wrote:
In my there is far less of a distinction than the false caricatures of either side (anal-retentive systematic logician trying to reduce the world to equations vs. mad, wannabe-bohemian spouting nonsensical performative poetry about otherness) make out, and people need to get beyond straw-man attacks to learn from one another and recognise the ability of the other discourse to proffer genuine insights that are worthy of serious, respectful debate.


This made me laugh - the caricatures, I mean. And I agree. I'm glad to say I'm slowly getting over my aversion to Continental philosophy - I'll probably start by taking a look at the existentialists eventually, or at least Heidegger. I'm wrapping up my MA now and hoping to start a PhD next fall, but it seems very unlikely that I'll seriously delve into anything but analytic philosophy in my formal studies.

I increasingly tend to think that one should regret one's inability (due to restrictions of time and personal interest) to study every major philosopher. I want to say that any philosopher to whom some people have dedicated entire scholarly careers has to be interesting on some level; or at least, it'd probably be impossible to make the case that their scholars have basically wasted their time.

Top
 Profile  
Nahsil
Clerical Sturmgeschütz

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 2:06 pm
Posts: 4577
Location: United States
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:50 pm 
 

Personally, the deeper into philosophy I go the more I like Buddhism (and forms of philosophy like existentialism that can stress life/the moment). I question the wisdom of endless categorization and analytic/linguistic thought. That said, I'm not a philosophy major. I've taken intro and logic, a class on esoteric platonism (Gnosticism, Hermeneutics, alchemy etc), a class on Nietzsche, and done some independent research, but I'm no expert.

But I do enjoy "jnana yoga" and I enjoy trying to attain balance between thinking and doing.
_________________
and we are born
from the same womb
and hewn from
the same stone - Primordial, "Heathen Tribes"

Top
 Profile  
Calusari
Metalhead

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:36 am
Posts: 792
Location: Australia
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 2:11 am 
 

megalowho wrote:
I increasingly tend to think that one should regret one's inability (due to restrictions of time and personal interest) to study every major philosopher. I want to say that any philosopher to whom some people have dedicated entire scholarly careers has to be interesting on some level; or at least, it'd probably be impossible to make the case that their scholars have basically wasted their time.


I definitely agree. It's always nice to discover that there are philosophers with great insights whose work one hasn't encountered yet, yet it is depressing to think that there are so many ideas out there that are simply beyond reach (because of time and finitude) while others who have engaged with them adore them so much that they devote their lives to studying them.
This is especially so once someone really interested in a particular thinker or issue explains (or tries to, as much as explaining one's passion is possible) their interest. Recently, for example, I've attended a couple of seminars about the one area of philosophy that I could never engage with, logic - one was by a friend presenting his completed thesis, another by one of the senior researchers in the department; both made me realise how profoundly interesting this field can be, how it could be possible to devote one's life to it, and how much I regretted not knowing more about the thinkers they mentioned.

Nahsil wrote:
Personally, the deeper into philosophy I go the more I like Buddhism (and forms of philosophy like existentialism that can stress life/the moment). I question the wisdom of endless categorization and analytic/linguistic thought. That said, I'm not a philosophy major. I've taken intro and logic, a class on esoteric platonism (Gnosticism, Hermeneutics, alchemy etc), a class on Nietzsche, and done some independent research, but I'm no expert.

But I do enjoy "jnana yoga" and I enjoy trying to attain balance between thinking and doing.


That's really interesting, and is one of those many areas about which I know far too little. I took one subject that was basically a short overview of about half a dozen Eastern philosophies (Buddhism, Hinduism, Confucianism, Tao, etc), with a little bit of comparative philosophy (those schools vis a vis Heidegger & Nietzsche, who were both influenced by Taoism and forms of Buddhism). I vaguely regret not taking more subjects like this, especially as the uni is known for its researchers in this regard (it used to offer about half a dozen subjects delving into specific Eastern schools of thought; a friend is actually doing his PhD in comparing Zen and phenomenology), but it's never quite engaged me as much as other areas.

Top
 Profile  
Dragunov
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 6:34 pm
Posts: 2260
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 6:52 pm 
 

Any recommendations for post-apocalyptic fiction?

Top
 Profile  
Zelkiiro
Pounding the world with a fish of steel

Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:30 pm
Posts: 7729
Location: Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 7:29 pm 
 

Dragunov wrote:
Any recommendations for post-apocalyptic fiction?

"Dawn" by Octavia Butler comes to mind.
_________________
I've written a fantasy novel. It's 145,000 157,586 184,899 words long!
It's also going to be the first part of a trilogy!
Currently seeking an agent willing to touch this massive doorstop.

Top
 Profile  
waiguoren
Veteran

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:23 am
Posts: 2741
Location: Umeå, Sweden
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 7:56 pm 
 

Dragunov wrote:
Any recommendations for post-apocalyptic fiction?


I Am Legend if you want a fun, quick read. I suppose someone will pop up and mention The Road, while I couldn't stand the effin' thing, who knows, you might like it, seeing as how you didn't specify much in your post.
_________________
I am a Chinese lady with a pair of big water eyes under the long eyelashes.I don't know how beautiful i am , but people usually say that I needn't do face-painting.

Top
 Profile  
Framentanz
Mallcore Kid

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:28 pm
Posts: 9
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:20 am 
 

Dragunov wrote:
Any recommendations for post-apocalyptic fiction?


Not strictly being post-apocalyptic, "The Doomed City" and "Roadside Picnic" by Arkady and Boris Strugatsky come to mind.

Top
 Profile  
inhumanist
Metal freak

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 5:09 pm
Posts: 5634
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:42 am 
 

2033 is the only post-apocalyptic novel I remember reading. It's fun and explores a lot of cool "what if" ideas, but don't expect anything deep (pun unintended).
_________________
Under_Starmere wrote:
iHumanism: Philosophy phoned in.
Metantoine wrote:
If Summoning is the sugar of fantasy metal, is Manowar the bacon?

Top
 Profile  
HeavyAsHell
Mallcore Kid

Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 15
Location: Russia
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:09 pm 
 

(I'm not sure if it is a right place to ask this question but I did not find anything better).
Anyway, could anyone recommend me several british and french realistic prose writers of ~1900-1960 period? I'm already familiar with the works of A.Bennet, J.Galsworthy, A.France, R.Rolland, J.Renard, G.Duhamel and P. Hériat but I want more. Most of the textbooks on history of literature concentrate their attention on different modernist works (Joyce, Woolf, Proust, etc. etc.) and tend to ignore most of the realistic works but I know for a fact that there were a lot of non-avantgarde writers during that period. I have no particular interest in neither modernist or philosophical books a-la Sartre and just looking for a plain old realism.

Top
 Profile  
Nahsil
Clerical Sturmgeschütz

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 2:06 pm
Posts: 4577
Location: United States
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:41 pm 
 

Canticle for Leibowitz is a post-apocalyptic epic.
_________________
and we are born
from the same womb
and hewn from
the same stone - Primordial, "Heathen Tribes"

Top
 Profile  
Calusari
Metalhead

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:36 am
Posts: 792
Location: Australia
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:22 am 
 

Dragunov wrote:
Any recommendations for post-apocalyptic fiction?


Perhaps try "Oryx and Crake" and "The Year of the Flood", by Margaret Atwood - while the latter is a sequel to the former, they can be read separately, too; both feature great characters and engaging, consistent world-building. Set in a not-quite-distant-enough future marked by rampant and rather surreal genetic experimentation, Houellebecq-ian carnality, and truly odd religions, these books present a sophisticated and somewhat philosophical take on the whole 'doom by rampant progress' scenario, less concerned with how its characters can survive than with the question of whether (and why) their lives are even worth continuing. The narrative switches between different times (before, during and after the apocalyptic events) and characters (including those who bring about said apocalypse) without being obviously 'clever' about it, so that you end up with a sweeping view of events and their possible meaning without even realising it.

Top
 Profile  
hakarl
Metel fraek

Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:41 pm
Posts: 8816
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:20 am 
 

Dragunov wrote:
Any recommendations for post-apocalyptic fiction?

I haven't read it yet, but Dying Earth by Jack Vance. The author is excellent, though his merciless irony might take you unawares. His Lyonesse series was one of the only pieces of literature to ever have shocked me.
_________________
"A glimpse of light is all that it takes to illuminate the darkness."

Top
 Profile  
failsafeman
Digital Dictator

Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:45 am
Posts: 11852
Location: In the Arena
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:45 am 
 

Calusari wrote:
Dragunov wrote:
Any recommendations for post-apocalyptic fiction?

Perhaps try "Oryx and Crake" and "The Year of the Flood", by Margaret Atwood - while the latter is a sequel to the former, they can be read separately, too; both feature great characters and engaging, consistent world-building. Set in a not-quite-distant-enough future marked by rampant and rather surreal genetic experimentation, Houellebecq-ian carnality, and truly odd religions, these books present a sophisticated and somewhat philosophical take on the whole 'doom by rampant progress' scenario, less concerned with how its characters can survive than with the question of whether (and why) their lives are even worth continuing. The narrative switches between different times (before, during and after the apocalyptic events) and characters (including those who bring about said apocalypse) without being obviously 'clever' about it, so that you end up with a sweeping view of events and their possible meaning without even realising it.

I enjoyed both of those books, however in the first one it bugged me a little as to how off-base her characterization of the protagonist was during his teenage years - teenage boys just aren't that emotionally mature when it comes to romance.
_________________
MorbidBlood wrote:
So the winner is Destruction and Infernal Overkill is the motherfucking skullcrushing poserkilling satan-worshiping 666 FUCK YOU greatest german thrash record.

Top
 Profile  
Calusari
Metalhead

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:36 am
Posts: 792
Location: Australia
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:19 am 
 

Though I wouldn't know directly, I can imagine; he did seem a bit too good to be true at times, though the description of him from another character's perspective in the second book altered that impression a bit - that made it seem a little more as though he had a somewhat unreliable view of his own actions (in contrast to the impact they actually had). I do agree, though - Atwood's portrayals of all the characters in their youth was a bit odd and unrealistic, even considering the distance of the setting.

Top
 Profile  
hakarl
Metel fraek

Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:41 pm
Posts: 8816
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:33 am 
 

I haven't read the novel in question, or anything else by Atwood for that matter, but I don't consider a character's unlikely characterisation to be a valid basis for criticism - having not read the book, I don't know if he's thoroughly, impossibly unrealistic, or that not only his personality is off-base, but also his success in everything he parttakes (Mary-Sue), especially the latter being more than a valid reason for criticism - as even I have known people whose unending goodness of personality defies all standards of adolescent males. To be sure, such a character in a novel requires a decent counterpoint to serve as a point of contrast and thus emphasise the former's peculiarities of character. If the author's seeming ignorance of a teenage boy's thoughts bothered you, by using such a counterpoint character, the author lets the readers know that this character is intended to be portrayed as an exceptional personality.
_________________
"A glimpse of light is all that it takes to illuminate the darkness."

Top
 Profile  
Calusari
Metalhead

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:36 am
Posts: 792
Location: Australia
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:42 am 
 

Definitely no 'Mary-Sue' here. :lol: No one's saying these weren't good books anyway, it's more of a minor element that might bother some readers and, even though I didn't mind much, I can certainly see where that view might be coming from... It's a little aside, that's all.

Top
 Profile  
Dragunov
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 6:34 pm
Posts: 2260
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 9:56 am 
 

Thanks for the recs, guys. Prior to the responses I went and picked up Lucifer's Hammer and Alas, Babylon, but now I'll have more to check out when I'm finished! :thumbsup:

Top
 Profile  
PhilosophicalFrog
The Hypercube

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 7:08 pm
Posts: 7631
Location: United States
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:03 pm 
 

AHH! I love Lucifer's Hammer a great, fun, awesome little book.
_________________
hats prices are at an all time low

Spoiler: show
║\
║▒\
║▒▒\
║░▒║
║░▒║with this blade
║░▒║i cut those who
║░▒║disrespect
║░▒║Carly Rae Jepsen
║░▒║
║░▒║
║░▒║
▓▓▓▓
[█▓]
[█▓]
[█▓]
[█▓]

Top
 Profile  
failsafeman
Digital Dictator

Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:45 am
Posts: 11852
Location: In the Arena
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:51 pm 
 

Ilwhyan wrote:
I haven't read the novel in question

I should have stopped reading there. It's silly to criticize a criticism of something you haven't even read.
_________________
MorbidBlood wrote:
So the winner is Destruction and Infernal Overkill is the motherfucking skullcrushing poserkilling satan-worshiping 666 FUCK YOU greatest german thrash record.

Top
 Profile  
hakarl
Metel fraek

Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:41 pm
Posts: 8816
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:15 am 
 

failsafeman wrote:
Ilwhyan wrote:
I haven't read the novel in question

I should have stopped reading there. It's silly to criticize a criticism of something you haven't even read.

Perhaps I should've mentioned that my post wasn't 100% directed at your comment or that particular novel - your criticising an unlikely seeming character simply got me thinking.
_________________
"A glimpse of light is all that it takes to illuminate the darkness."


Last edited by hakarl on Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
failsafeman
Digital Dictator

Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:45 am
Posts: 11852
Location: In the Arena
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:20 am 
 

Ilwhyan wrote:
I don't consider a character's unlikely characterisation to be a valid basis for criticism

Yes you were.
_________________
MorbidBlood wrote:
So the winner is Destruction and Infernal Overkill is the motherfucking skullcrushing poserkilling satan-worshiping 666 FUCK YOU greatest german thrash record.

Top
 Profile  
hakarl
Metel fraek

Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:41 pm
Posts: 8816
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:26 am 
 

If you didn't stop reading at that point, though, I'm surprised my intentions were that unclear to you. Your mentioning a teenager character's emotional maturity being unbelievable reminded me of certain people I know, and that unusual, peculiar types do exist. It all boils down to the author's portrayal of such characters - whether characters with unusual traits are portrayed as entirely normal, or if it's implied that they are indeed strange. I absolutely wasn't criticising or defending the book, but merely musing something that this made me think about.
_________________
"A glimpse of light is all that it takes to illuminate the darkness."

Top
 Profile  
Under_Starmere
Abhorrent Fish-Man

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:00 pm
Posts: 5576
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:20 pm 
 

Anyone here read Umberto Eco's Baudolino? I recently got a neat paperback copy of it from my family and am definitely curious about it. The Name of the Rose was a novel I enjoyed immensely and I'm really looking forward to digging into another of Eco's medieval explorations.
_________________
Aeons (Cosmic drone ambient project)
Debut album out on Reverse Alignment

Top
 Profile  
failsafeman
Digital Dictator

Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:45 am
Posts: 11852
Location: In the Arena
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 12:16 am 
 

I haven't read that one, but if you're already a fan of Eco then you definitely need to read Foucault's Pendulum if you haven't. It's not set in the middle ages, but the subject matter deals extensively with it, specifically the Templars. It's a fantastic look at how conspiracy theories work and the psychology behind them.
_________________
MorbidBlood wrote:
So the winner is Destruction and Infernal Overkill is the motherfucking skullcrushing poserkilling satan-worshiping 666 FUCK YOU greatest german thrash record.

Top
 Profile  
Under_Starmere
Abhorrent Fish-Man

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:00 pm
Posts: 5576
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:49 am 
 

Sounds interesting... To be fair, The Name of the Rose is the only Eco novel I'm familiar with, so it's hard to say I'm a fan of his per se, but still, I'd like to check it out. I also have his The Island of the Day Before on the shelf. Will probably have to wait until I finish Wolfe's The Book of the Long Sun in any case. I read the first book, Nightside the Long Sun, a couple years ago, and now picking up the tome again to recommence I feel I need to read it again to properly experience the story :(. Not that it would be anything but a pleasure to re-read, but I'm not a man with much reading time and it's a bit painful thinking about retreading that much ground. Urrg. Methinks I will have to make do with a skim job, though even writing that makes me feel kind of dirty.
_________________
Aeons (Cosmic drone ambient project)
Debut album out on Reverse Alignment

Top
 Profile  
~Guest 132892
Wastelander

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:18 am
Posts: 6349
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 4:16 am 
 

Ugh. I need to stop reading stuff about German nihilists. I'm currently reading a book called Nietzsche's Machiavellian Politics. The author is basically making a point about the fine line between the distinction of morality and politics, and uses a comparison between Nietzsche and Machiavelli as an example. It's fairly interesting if not a little dry.

Top
 Profile  
Nahsil
Clerical Sturmgeschütz

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 2:06 pm
Posts: 4577
Location: United States
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 3:16 pm 
 

Huh, I could have sworn I replied to the Eco conversation. Guess I was too drunk to submit.

Read part of NotR, enjoyed it, he's a masterful writer and thinker. Wanted to read other things though. Eventually I'm gonna open Foucault's Pendulum, probably more my kind of topic having read and enjoyed Illuminatus Trilogy.
_________________
and we are born
from the same womb
and hewn from
the same stone - Primordial, "Heathen Tribes"

Top
 Profile  
Dragunov
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 6:34 pm
Posts: 2260
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 8:07 pm 
 

I can vouch for Foucault's Pendulum, great read. Abominatrix talks about it a little bit in the OP of this thread.

Any recommendations for non-fiction focusing on World War I? Not looking for anything too specific, just something interesting you guys may have read pertaining to the war.

Top
 Profile  
grauer_mausling
Metalhead

Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:00 am
Posts: 1873
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:45 pm 
 

a bit late for the post apocalyptic issue but maybe you, Dragunov, are still interested...

Surely it depends on what kind of post-apocal. books you personally like to read. I myself love it a bit more
when it takes another turn than "depressive" (in lack of a better term) like "The Road", "I Am Legend" etc.
So maybe the following are of interest to you:

"Damnation Alley" by Roger Zelazny
Sometime after a nuclear apocalypse, there are two nations left in the former U.S. (perhaps in the world);
the nations of California and Boston. All the rest is a wasteland of radioactivity, mutant beasts, super storms
and violent gangs, known as Damnation Alley. Word comes that a plague has struck Boston.
California sends a group of their best drivers across Damnation Alley to deliver vaccine.
To lead this group, they shanghai Hell Tanner: criminal, the last Hell's Angel and the best damned driver they have.

"Go-Go Girls of the Apocalypse" by Victor Gischler
Mortimer Tate was a recently divorced insurance salesman when he holed up in a cave on top of a mountain
in Tennessee and rode out the end of the world. Go-Go Girls of the Apocalypse begins nine years later,
when he emerges into a bizarre landscape filled with hollow reminders of an America that no longer exists.
The highways are lined with abandoned automobiles; electricity is generated by indentured servants pedaling
stationary bicycles.
What little civilization remains revolves around Joey Armageddon's Sassy A-Go-Go strip clubs, where the beer is
cold, the lap dancers are hot, and the bouncers are armed with M16s.
Accompanied by his cowboy sidekick Buffalo Bill, the gorgeous stripper Sheila, and the mountain man Ted,
Mortimer journeys to the lost city of Atlanta -- and a showdown that might determine the fate of humanity.

and I can't recommend the "Dark Future" novels by Kim Newman enough. Fantastic reads!!!!! It's not post-apocalyptic per
classic definition but def. has the kind of atmosphere.
Imagine Mad Max meeting Lovecraft with many sarcastic and ironic nods towards a possible future (ok, written
from an eighties point of view how the 90s would have looked like). You can read about the setting a bit here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Future#World

Regarding the WW1 request. I can't help you out with non-fiction books about but I just finished reading this one here
and I just have to share it as it's fantastic stuff (second book of the series was ordered yesterday ;) )
However it is very detailled and as far as I can say very close in the descriptions of the "life" (haha) in the trenches.
It is kind of a read when you mix "All Quiet on the Western Front" with the great scifi of Edgar Rice Burroughs.

"Black Hand Gang" by Pat Kelleher
Here's sth about the story:
As the lads of the 13th Pennine Fusiliers are charging towards their destiny on the battlefield of Harcourt Woods,
something weird happens. They fall unconscious, and when they wake, they, a Sopwith Strutter, the "Ivanhoe",
one of the first British tanks and her crew, and the Harcourt battlefield have been transported to another, possibly parallel planet.
The Germans are gone, but there are worse perils waiting for them. There are man-sized, man-hunting insects, poisonous flora,
man-eating flora, and man-sized jackalesque creatures that find people's warm innards mighty tasty. And then they find that
the planet has native aborigine tribes, one of which is led by Naparandwe (Napoo) and call themselves Free Urmens,
and they are at war with the Khungarri, an insectoid race that has built hive-cities, and who capture Urmen to be used as slaves.

This pic gives a good feel for the atmosphere;
Image

edit:
a non-fiction WW1 book just crossed my mind. have a try with this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storm_of_Steel
_________________
BULLETRIDE ACTIONWEAR - my logo works and graphic stuff
click to visit my Deviantart-Page for some logo and shirt design work
(contact me if your band needs logo / design work)

Top
 Profile  
Dragunov
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 6:34 pm
Posts: 2260
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:12 pm 
 

Awesome recommendations! Each one of those sound like something I could definitely get into, thank you! Off to Amazon...

Top
 Profile  
PhilosophicalFrog
The Hypercube

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 7:08 pm
Posts: 7631
Location: United States
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:29 pm 
 

andersbang wrote:
I'll also mention The Kindly Ones by Littel that fits Markov's request. It's about an SS officer in the Sonderkommandos behind the Wehrmacht lines on the Eastern Front and filled with graphic details both psychological (he has personal issues concerning homosexuality and incest as well as broader psychological issues from the whole, you know, exterminating people thingamajing) and of course a lot of gore, what with him being an SS officer and all. Finally a lot of 'philosofical' thoughts justificating his and the Nazi's work.


AHHHHH. I talked about this book like eight pages ago. One of my absolute favorites, a haunting, beautifully written and engaging story that truly humanizes the Nazis as individuals, instead of a collective group. Ugh, so damn good. The imagery is incredible, the story moves like lightning.
_________________
hats prices are at an all time low

Spoiler: show
║\
║▒\
║▒▒\
║░▒║
║░▒║with this blade
║░▒║i cut those who
║░▒║disrespect
║░▒║Carly Rae Jepsen
║░▒║
║░▒║
║░▒║
▓▓▓▓
[█▓]
[█▓]
[█▓]
[█▓]

Top
 Profile  
andersbang
Metalhead

Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:28 am
Posts: 1069
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:06 am 
 

Huh, I couldn't find what you've written about it, but I agree, it's a great story. Definitely worth a re-read from me sometime soon. I have the English translation on the shelf, read it in Danish some time back.

Top
 Profile  
grauer_mausling
Metalhead

Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:00 am
Posts: 1873
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 4:36 pm 
 

Dragunov wrote:
Awesome recommendations! Each one of those sound like something I could definitely get into, thank you! Off to Amazon...


you're welcome :) Here's another (sorry, again no non-fiction) "WW1 meets occult" thing I read a few years back and enjoyed:

"The Judas Cross" by Charles Sheffield

"As the armies of the Kaiser advance through France, a secret war for the possession of an ancient artifact said to
contain the soul of Judas Iscariot comes to a critical point in the chateau of the Marquis Villette (the cross's current
guardian). While the Germans seek to acquire the item, the cross begins to exercise its own subtle corruptive influence over its safekeeper. "

Oh, and as to post apocalyptic books - the "Endworld" and the "Deathlands" series are also quite good to read every now and then.
Here's some more information about both series:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endworld
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deathlands

Btw - are you also interested in "WW2 meets occult" stuff? Have a few books I could recommend then... Just let me know...
_________________
BULLETRIDE ACTIONWEAR - my logo works and graphic stuff
click to visit my Deviantart-Page for some logo and shirt design work
(contact me if your band needs logo / design work)

Top
 Profile  
Dragunov
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 6:34 pm
Posts: 2260
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:03 pm 
 

The Judas Cross sounds good too! And yes, WW2 is cool too. The reason I asked for WW1 is because I'm getting very anxious for the Sacriphyx LP to be released, and their lyrics are more or less based on WW1.

Thanks again! :)

Top
 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic Go to page Previous  1 ... 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74 ... 158  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

 
Jump to:  

Back to the Encyclopaedia Metallum


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group