Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives

Message board

* FAQ    * Search   * Register   * Login 



Reply to topic
Author Message Previous topic | Next topic
oneyoudontknow
Cum insantientibus furere necesse est.

Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 6:25 pm
Posts: 5347
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:34 am 
 

The idea is simple and as no one wants to read much text, I will keep this post short. Why not have some sort of a thread in which the preferences of the writers in terms of the genres are listed:

Example
  • Main focus: black metal, death metal, pop/rock
  • Less focus: grindcore, punk
  • Never: thrash, power metal.

Not every genre has to be dealt with, but some basic information would be appropriate. Generally it seems useful to list the genres from important to less important ones; three to four should do it.

I contact bands and request information on their releases and it happens that some play metal that is not my cup of tea; a groove metal band wanted to have a review very recently ... and currently I try to support several other bands of various types. With such a thread bands would be offered a single and transparent source of potential reviewer.

Note:
as I am quite inactive in terms of the reviews on the MA recently, I see no point in adding me to the list.

Edit:
post was polished a bit.
_________________

I write for these magazines:
http://swirlsofnoise.com/
http://againstmagazine.com/

Analysis of band names:
http://www.metal-archives.com/board/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=103987


Last edited by oneyoudontknow on Sun Feb 20, 2011 7:21 am, edited 2 times in total.
Top
 Profile  
Napero
GedankenPanzer

Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 4:16 pm
Posts: 8563
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 10:11 am 
 

Knowing a bit of the background of the thread, I think this is a good idea, and if we get enough replies, I might even sticky this as a permanent source for bands wishing to get their works reviewed.

Personally, my preferred fields are:
Thrash
Death (including death-thrash, prog death, death'n'roll...)
Black-ish and doom-ish (not the hyper-satanic blast beat saturation bombings, though)
Avant-garde and oddities (Axis of Perdition, The Wicked, Woods of Belial... but beware, a gimmick album calls for a gimmick review...)

No power metal, pure prog, raw black, or very traditional heavy metal except occasionally, sorry. And definitely, no core or stoner, ever. Due to the constraints on my listening and principles, I only review physical CDs, and possibly tapes. I don't have a vinyl player, and I don't have much chances of using MP3s, really, but I dislike them anyway.
_________________
Chest wounds suck (when properly inflicted).
-Butch-

Top
 Profile  
joncheetham88
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 10:41 pm
Posts: 619
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:33 am 
 

That's a neat idea. It should also cut down the recently ballooning number of threads started (and immediately locked) with bands asking for their stuff to be reviewed. And I like the idea of us being able to pass on review requests we don't want to handle ourselves.

I'll review
Doom metal (trad and stoner, also death/ doom)
Black metal (any kind)
Death metal (old school mostly)
Power metal

Or to follow your OP, doom metal, black metal, death metal, power metal

Avoid grind, tech-anything, most prog.

Although I listen to more death metal than black metal, black metal is a genre I'm more interested to hear new sounds in, so I've put it above.

I have a keen interest in bands from countries where the metal scene isn't huge or is just starting, Asian countries for example where it might be even harder to get noticed/ signed, especially the Middle East/ West Asia etc.
_________________
"I have been given the flesh of the sun to eat, and the milk of the moon to drink.
I have pressed through the long night and been reborn through the realms of dissolution."

http://baileysmmcreamy.blogspot.com

Top
 Profile  
failsafeman
Digital Dictator

Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:45 am
Posts: 9733
Location: United States
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:56 am 
 

This is a pretty good idea. It would also be useful for readers looking for an expert in a certain subgenre.

My reviewing preferences are as follows:

Power and speed metal (specifically USPM)
Traditional heavy metal, both ancient and modern
Traditional doom and stoner metal (the more upbeat variety, rather than the ultra slow, repetitive type)
Progressive metal

I will not under any circumstances review:
Black metal
Grindcore/metalcore/deathcore
Brutal death metal
_________________
antonthereaper wrote:
Seriously, why ban me??????? That topic had nothing wrong with it! Theres something wrong with you i can tell you! You're immoral banning of my account! Anyways, i'm creating my own metal arcives.

http://extrememetalencyclopedia.webs.com/

Top
 Profile  
SharpAndSlender
Metalhead

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:49 am
Posts: 2260
Location: Bradenton, Florida
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:02 pm 
 

Probably best for me:

Brutal/slam death metal/deathcore
Goregrind/Grindcore
Funeral doom
Black metal

Not real good with thrash, NWOBHM, trad doom, etc. In short, the opposite of failsafeman.
_________________
Trial By Ordeal:
http://trialbyordeal666.blogspot.com/

Twitter:
http://www.twitter.com/noktorn01

Lepernicus wrote:
Every record that dipshit sold took away money that could have went to a far more deserving band such as Immolation.

Top
 Profile  
whensunburnsred
Metal newbie

Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:58 am
Posts: 98
Location: Denmark
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:14 pm 
 

Good idea, indeed. I haven't been reviewing for a while, but I plan to come back in short.

Thrash metal
Traditional heavy metal
Power/Speed metal in all of its variations
_________________
Everyone's always in favour of saving Hitler's brain, but when you put it in the body of a great white shark, uuuuuuh... suddenly you've gone too far!

Top
 Profile  
kimiwind
Metalhead

Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:45 am
Posts: 483
Location: Japan
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:22 pm 
 

Interesting thread. Nice try Oneyoudontknow.

Anyways, my Favorite list of genres and subgenres is as follows:

Power, Speed, Progressive Metal. 1
Melodic/Technical/Atmospheric Death Metal. 2
Symphonic/Melodic Black Metal. 3
Heavy, Viking, Folk Metal. 4
Possibly "Thrash" if it's mixed with another genre. 5

I dislike reviewing anything related to doom, brutal death/ Grind, -core, and stoner.


Last edited by kimiwind on Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
OzzyApu
Metal freak

Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 12:11 am
Posts: 9897
Location: Seattle, United States
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:42 pm 
 

See this page, too.

I usually don't take requests, but here's what I generally review.

- Death metal / Melodic death metal
- Blackened death, OSDM, death/doom
- Heavy, speed, power (preferably European / Japanese)
- Black metal, atmospheric, dark...
- Older thrash metal

I don't like reviewing / tend not to review grind, brutal death, tech-music, prog fusion, most melodeath, -core, doom / stoner, experimental, and industrial.
_________________
gomorro wrote:
Yesterday was the birthday of school pal and I met the chick of my sigh (I've talked about here before, the she-wolf I use to be inlove with)... Maaan she was using a mini-skirt too damn insane... Dude you could saw her entire soul every time she sit...

Top
 Profile  
yentass
Metalhead

Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 9:28 am
Posts: 911
Location: Israel
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:25 pm 
 

Will do all doom metal except traditional

Don't mind reviewing death metal (ruling out brutal DM) or -core stuff. Oh, and I might take a crack at ambient/neoclassical, too.

Will not do thrash, prog, black (except depressive black, industrial black or Mork Gryning), power and heavy metals.
_________________
Voidal, Doom/Death Metulz.
kingnuuuur wrote:
DoomMetalAlchemist wrote:
I know nothing of hair care, so bare with me.

Metal dudes, assemble in the shower!

Top
 Profile  
Pfuntner
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:33 pm
Posts: 1096
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:40 pm 
 

Progressive music in all forms is something I have a lot to talk about, so Prog metal is always a go for me. Post metal/atmospheric sludge/whatever you want to call it is another speciality. I have a pretty good ear for metalcore too, but don't expect too much positive stuff from me.

I love death metal, but I'm not very good at describing it, same goes with black metal. The more progressive the power metal the better written the review will be, but normal power metal is fair game. Haven't reviewed enough doom to say one way or another.
_________________
Random Child : http://randomchild.bandcamp.com/

Top
 Profile  
iamntbatman
Chaos Breed

Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:55 am
Posts: 7993
Location: Innsmouth
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 6:54 pm 
 

Great idea!

-Death metal, but not so much brutal/slam/tech/prog unless it's really atmospheric or something
-Black metal of just about any type minus extremely borderline "black/noise" stuff
-Any sort of doom/stoner
-Anything crust flavored
-Folk metal, but only if it tends toward the blackened side of things

I'm not really up for power, heavy or thrash (unless it's black/thrash or death/thrash, etc.) for the time being as I'm not really that versed in them. I can't really imagine ever doing prog metal or metalcore/deathcore reviews.

Oh, and PLEASE only contact me for reviews if your band is actually metal! I've gotten a couple of requests from bands not on the Archives and not metal enough for me to add. I only do reviews here.
_________________
Exigence wrote:
I love hearing Six Feet Under's covers of classic songs.


COMA VOID | GLOAMING | FAUSTIAN ORBS

Top
 Profile  
Evenfiel
Heavy Metal Hunter

Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 9:50 am
Posts: 6144
Location: Brazil
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:21 pm 
 

You guys could also add that to your profiles.

Top
 Profile  
MutantClannfear
Metalhead

Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 12:12 am
Posts: 2372
Location: United States
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:28 pm 
 

I like reviewing:

Death metal
Brutal death metal
Deathcore (for the big cocks in my ass)
Doom metal/drone doom
Oddities

I'm a relative noob to black metal so I'm going to brush up on it before I start attempting to review it :P

Top
 Profile  
Oblarg
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:59 pm
Posts: 2379
Location: The second sea
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:34 pm 
 

I'm not a particularly big reviewer, but for what it's worth:

Power/speed metal, both USPM and German power metal (Scanner, Angel Dust, etc.)
Progressive metal, both early proto-prog (Awaken the Guardian sort of stuff) and modern prog, but not super-technical Watchtower derivatives.
Traditional metal (WASP, Armored Saint, etc.)
Non-extreme thrash metal (Overkill or Toxik, for instance).
Epic doom metal (Solstice, Doomsword, etc.)
_________________
iamntbatman wrote:
manowar are literally five times the band that fates warning are: each member is as good as fates warning alone, then joey's bass solos are like an entire extra fates warning

Top
 Profile  
hells_unicorn
Metalhead

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:32 pm
Posts: 2253
Location: United States
PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:19 am 
 

Genres I like in order:

Power/Speed Metal (European or USPM)
Thrash Metal (primitive, Bay Area, German Teutonic and Crust)
Heavy/Traditional/NWOBHM
Folk Metal (blackened and power/heroic)
Black Metal (2nd wave, Symphonic and some Ambient)
Death Metal (melodic, death/thrash, pre-1997 brutal/technical, some death/grind)
Progressive Metal (traditional Dream Theater stuff mostly)
Doom Metal (traditional, stoner and epic)
Gothic Metal

Genres I generally don't like but review often and have experience with:

Groove Metal/Neo-Thrash
Brutal and Technical Death Metal (post-1997)

Genres I don't review much or at all

Metalcore
Grindcore
Deathcore
_________________
My projects:
Frost Giant
Ominous Glory

My reviews.

R.I.P. Ronnie James Dio (July 14, 1942 - May 16, 2010)

Top
 Profile  
autothrall
Metal newbie

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:05 am
Posts: 238
Location: United States
PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:19 am 
 

I guess my preferential order would be:

Thrash or death/thrash metal (old and new) ->
Death metal (primitive or technical)
Black metal (all sorts) ->
NWOBHM/heavy and power/speed metal
Melodic death
Folk and progressive metal ->
Doom, gothic metal, drone, and sludge. ->
Groove metal or grindcore.

The metalcore and deathcore bands I enjoy are few and far between, and I'm not normally into nu metal or fairycore (Epica, Nightwish, etc.)

Between physical and digital promos for bands/labels, personal review projects, and the rest of life, I don't always get the chance to write up everything bands send me, but I do try to get around to a lot of it.
_________________
Reviews: http://www.fromthedustreturned.com
RYM Lists: http://rateyourmusic.com/list/autothrall/

Top
 Profile  
Derigin
Anthropophagus

Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:25 am
Posts: 2736
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:14 pm 
 

Will do:
Black (of all kinds)
Death (old-school primarily, but OK with brutal and other variants)
Thrash (of most kinds, sans Crossover)
Folk

May do:
Doom (traditional, preferred)
Gothic (of most kinds)
Heavy/Power
Prog
Ambient-based
Melodeath

Wont do:
Metalcore (of any kind)
Stoner
Groove
Sludge
Drone
Speed

These tentative sections are judged primarily on experience and knowledge, not necessarily on whether I "like" a genre or enjoy it. For example, I don't know enough of groove or sludge to judge either fairly, but that doesn't mean I might not like bands that play one or the other. Likewise, there are some tenets of folk metal I don't enjoy, but have the experience with and knowledge of to review with informed subjectivity.

My choice of what to review is often somewhat arbitrary. It is usually whatever band at the moment that I am interested in judging; doing "contracted out" reviews is a rarity for me. Right now, I'm more or less booked for such reviews, with Vomiting Skulls pending for some time. Otherwise, I usually try to review works that don't already have reviews.

Edit: As for the medium, I'm open to just about anything. CDs, Tapes, Vinyl, MP3s, 8-track, whatnot. I will crosscheck to make sure what I have is accurate to what I am reviewing, regardless if it's physical or digital. I have the capacity to play both tapes and vinyl.

Top
 Profile  
Zelkiiro
Pounding the world with a fish of steel

Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:30 pm
Posts: 4136
Location: United States
PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 12:41 pm 
 

My reviews will follow my preferred subgenres: heavy, power, speed, progressive, gothic, doom, symphonic, and the very occasional thrash.

Reviewing an album from a subgenre you already don't like seems to be an exercise in futility. Also bias.
_________________
Anime Reviews every two weeks!
Artwork once or twice a year!
M-A reviews every leap year!
Last.fm all day long!

Top
 Profile  
Derigin
Anthropophagus

Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:25 am
Posts: 2736
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 2:57 pm 
 

Using your logic, it's equally bias to review from subgenres you already do like.

Top
 Profile  
Zelkiiro
Pounding the world with a fish of steel

Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:30 pm
Posts: 4136
Location: United States
PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 8:53 pm 
 

Derigin wrote:
Using your logic, it's equally bias to review from subgenres you already do like.

Well, in my case, a bad doom metal album is still going to get a low rating, but if I were to review anything by, say, Morbid Angel, it could be the best thing ever in its own right, but because I don't like the vocal style or the overall sound, I would end up giving it a lower score than it would probably, objectively deserve.

See what I mean?
_________________
Anime Reviews every two weeks!
Artwork once or twice a year!
M-A reviews every leap year!
Last.fm all day long!

Top
 Profile  
The_Poltergeist
Metal newbie

Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 10:11 am
Posts: 134
Location: Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:07 pm 
 

Zelkiiro wrote:
Derigin wrote:
Using your logic, it's equally bias to review from subgenres you already do like.

Well, in my case, a bad doom metal album is still going to get a low rating, but if I were to review anything by, say, Morbid Angel, it could be the best thing ever in its own right, but because I don't like the vocal style or the overall sound, I would end up giving it a lower score than it would probably, objectively deserve.

See what I mean?


So a bad doom metal album would still get a higher score than it would probably, objectively deserve because you like the vocal style and the overal sound, even if they fuck it up completely.

Top
 Profile  
Zelkiiro
Pounding the world with a fish of steel

Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:30 pm
Posts: 4136
Location: United States
PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:48 pm 
 

The_Poltergeist wrote:
Zelkiiro wrote:
Derigin wrote:
Using your logic, it's equally bias to review from subgenres you already do like.

Well, in my case, a bad doom metal album is still going to get a low rating, but if I were to review anything by, say, Morbid Angel, it could be the best thing ever in its own right, but because I don't like the vocal style or the overall sound, I would end up giving it a lower score than it would probably, objectively deserve.

See what I mean?


So a bad doom metal album would still get a higher score than it would probably, objectively deserve because you like the vocal style and the overal sound, even if they fuck it up completely.

Not quite. If they botched the vocals, I'd give 'em shit for it. :U

To make an analogy: I don't like art-house movies. It probably wouldn't matter if the message the film was conveying is deeper than Tool (you'll see what I did there), I most likely will still hate it.

However, because I love comedies, I will be more apt at picking out the shit from the gold. Because I willingly familiarize myself with the genre and often enjoy it, a bad egg will still ruin my day.
_________________
Anime Reviews every two weeks!
Artwork once or twice a year!
M-A reviews every leap year!
Last.fm all day long!

Top
 Profile  
droneriot
RETIRED

Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 1:17 pm
Posts: 5245
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:08 pm 
 

What you are arguing for has nothing to do with liking or disliking a genre, but with being familiar or unfamiliar with a genre. That being unfamiliar with a genre can be a consequence of disliking a genre does not mean that they are the same.
_________________
http://www.last.fm/user/droneriot
Join my death/doom group on Last.fm!!
My blog: http://droneriot.blogspot.de/
Alpha Drone at Bandcamp: http://alphadrone.bandcamp.com

Top
 Profile  
Zelkiiro
Pounding the world with a fish of steel

Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:30 pm
Posts: 4136
Location: United States
PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:21 pm 
 

droneriot wrote:
What you are arguing for has nothing to do with liking or disliking a genre, but with being familiar or unfamiliar with a genre. That being unfamiliar with a genre can be a consequence of disliking a genre does not mean that they are the same.

That could definitely explain it, though my point still stands: To review something, even a magnificent something, from a genre I detest would be pretty unfair.
_________________
Anime Reviews every two weeks!
Artwork once or twice a year!
M-A reviews every leap year!
Last.fm all day long!

Top
 Profile  
droneriot
RETIRED

Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 1:17 pm
Posts: 5245
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:45 pm 
 

How would it be magnificent if you detest it? Do you claim to have some objective clairvoyance that reaches beyond your subjective perception to determine what would be objectively magnificent while it is entirely detestable to your ears? Or would you be going by the opinions of others who do like the subgenre, taking their word for it that it is a magnificent work of art, even though your ears clearly tell you otherwise?

Perhaps I am to pragmatic in my approach. For me, if I detest something, it cannot be magnificent. If it was magnificent I wouldn't detest it. If somebody else tells me something I detest is magnificent, I tell that someone he or she is wrong. Very simple, very clear.

You should give it a try, it saves you the trouble of entangling yourself in self-contradictions trying to defend the notion that how much you are into a subgenre or not determines how biased you are, simply admit to yourself and others that you are ALWAYS biased no matter what, that everything you write in a review is a biased personal opinion, and that when all is said and done your opinion and yours alone is the only thing that matters in a review you yourself write.
_________________
http://www.last.fm/user/droneriot
Join my death/doom group on Last.fm!!
My blog: http://droneriot.blogspot.de/
Alpha Drone at Bandcamp: http://alphadrone.bandcamp.com

Top
 Profile  
failsafeman
Digital Dictator

Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:45 am
Posts: 9733
Location: United States
PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:05 pm 
 

Two subjective opinions can quite easily disagree with one another and both be right at the same time.
_________________
antonthereaper wrote:
Seriously, why ban me??????? That topic had nothing wrong with it! Theres something wrong with you i can tell you! You're immoral banning of my account! Anyways, i'm creating my own metal arcives.

http://extrememetalencyclopedia.webs.com/

Top
 Profile  
Zelkiiro
Pounding the world with a fish of steel

Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:30 pm
Posts: 4136
Location: United States
PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:14 pm 
 

droneriot wrote:
Perhaps I am to pragmatic in my approach. For me, if I detest something, it cannot be magnificent. If it was magnificent I wouldn't detest it. If somebody else tells me something I detest is magnificent, I tell that someone he or she is wrong. Very simple, very clear.

E.g. I like Bolt Thrower, but I hate hate hate hate HATE HATE HATE HATE death metal vox.
_________________
Anime Reviews every two weeks!
Artwork once or twice a year!
M-A reviews every leap year!
Last.fm all day long!

Top
 Profile  
caspian
Wanderer of the Wastes

Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:29 pm
Posts: 6119
Location: Australia
PostPosted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:10 pm 
 

Well, the thing I know best, probably enjoy most and certainly write most about is the slow and boring; anything with heaps of ambient in it, drone, and to a slightly lesser extent stoner doom. Then come the other doom types- funeral, then sludge, then trad. After that I think Black Metal- the gayer, ambient-er variants anyway.

I'm happy to do the occaisonal death, thrash (er, Metallica) and even the occaisonal heavy metal review; some of my best reviews (imo, of course) have been on traditional HM. I just don't listen to a lot of the stuff.

Stuff that I avoid as much as possible: grind and its' variants, folk, modern death metal and melodeath, folk, groove (I don't really hate teh genre, I just can't think of anything to write), and folk. And prog, of course.
_________________
http://www.pozible.com/project/177604 <-- got a crowdfunder thing going for an album I'm doing. Pre-order something!

Top
 Profile  
Necrophagist50
Metal newbie

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:42 pm
Posts: 129
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 12:38 pm 
 

I am new to this,but I am willing to do mostly:
thrash(old school,or some newer groove-neo thrash too)
death(brutal,technical,some old school,very few melodic)
progressive(depends,but mostly DT,SX and PoS)
doom(especially traditional and sludge-stoner doom)

might ocassionally do:
folk metal
heavy/power/speed/traditional
very few melodic death


won't do:
gothic metal
most of black metal

Top
 Profile  
MacMoney
Man of the Cloth

Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 10:17 pm
Posts: 2014
PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:59 am 
 

Preferred:

Death metal though not slam or overtly technical.
More traditional black metal

Will do:

Doom/stoner
Power (not flower) metal
Traditional metal
Thrash metal

Won't touch:

Drone
Funeral doom
Grindcore
Flower metal

Progressive and avant garde can go either way.

Top
 Profile  
sisters_of_merciless
Metal newbie

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:33 pm
Posts: 151
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 11:58 pm 
 

I added a statistical version of this to the EM Discordance:

Reviewer Marketplace

That shows all reviewers with 50+ reviews, and for each one their style tendencies (in terms of actual reviews, not stated preferences!).

And, as OzzyApu noted, the page for each reviewer in the Discordance already has a couple pages of stats: Review Count, Band Count, Reviews/Band, Review Dates, Average Years After, a sorted Ratings list, Average, Deviation, Median, Mode, Review-Challenge participation, breakdowns by Bands/Styles/Countries, and a ranked list of similar reviewers by band overlap...

Top
 Profile  
dystopia4
Thumbman

Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:47 pm
Posts: 3572
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:03 pm 
 

I'd review almost anything but my favourites are:

- Doom and any of its variants
-black
-folk
-melodic and old school death metal

Top
 Profile  
yentass
Metalhead

Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 9:28 am
Posts: 911
Location: Israel
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:52 am 
 

sisters_of_merciless wrote:
I added a statistical version of this to the EM Discordance:

Reviewer Marketplace

That shows all reviewers with 50+ reviews, and for each one their style tendencies (in terms of actual reviews, not stated preferences!).

And, as OzzyApu noted, the page for each reviewer in the Discordance already has a couple pages of stats: Review Count, Band Count, Reviews/Band, Review Dates, Average Years After, a sorted Ratings list, Average, Deviation, Median, Mode, Review-Challenge participation, breakdowns by Bands/Styles/Countries, and a ranked list of similar reviewers by band overlap...


Can you add a filter that seeds out the inactive ones (those who didn't post a review in the last, say, half a year, or banned users)? Cause I see there names like UltraBoris, PseudoGoatKill (inactive since, like, 2005), Shadow0fDeath (banned)...
_________________
Voidal, Doom/Death Metulz.
kingnuuuur wrote:
DoomMetalAlchemist wrote:
I know nothing of hair care, so bare with me.

Metal dudes, assemble in the shower!

Top
 Profile  
sisters_of_merciless
Metal newbie

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:33 pm
Posts: 151
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:17 pm 
 

Done. I did a year, just to have a nicely recognizable "365" people can see...

Top
 Profile  
hells_unicorn
Metalhead

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:32 pm
Posts: 2253
Location: United States
PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:01 pm 
 

sisters_of_merciless wrote:
Done. I did a year, just to have a nicely recognizable "365" people can see...


Is the total reviews count for each user slightly out of date? I'm asking primarily because every list shows Noktorn behind me when he should be ahead of me by about 50 reviews.
_________________
My projects:
Frost Giant
Ominous Glory

My reviews.

R.I.P. Ronnie James Dio (July 14, 1942 - May 16, 2010)

Top
 Profile  
Napero
GedankenPanzer

Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 4:16 pm
Posts: 8563
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 6:40 am 
 

hells_unicorn wrote:
sisters_of_merciless wrote:
Done. I did a year, just to have a nicely recognizable "365" people can see...


Is the total reviews count for each user slightly out of date? I'm asking primarily because every list shows Noktorn behind me when he should be ahead of me by about 50 reviews.

I think it counts splits only once, unlike the MA stats page. Noktorn has a shitload of reviews on those.
_________________
Chest wounds suck (when properly inflicted).
-Butch-

Top
 Profile  
hells_unicorn
Metalhead

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:32 pm
Posts: 2253
Location: United States
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:52 pm 
 

Napero wrote:
hells_unicorn wrote:
sisters_of_merciless wrote:
Done. I did a year, just to have a nicely recognizable "365" people can see...


Is the total reviews count for each user slightly out of date? I'm asking primarily because every list shows Noktorn behind me when he should be ahead of me by about 50 reviews.

I think it counts splits only once, unlike the MA stats page. Noktorn has a shitload of reviews on those.


I see, that makes sense. I took note that my own total and Autothrall's were a little off as well and assumed there was some sort of lag in the turnover on the discordance.
_________________
My projects:
Frost Giant
Ominous Glory

My reviews.

R.I.P. Ronnie James Dio (July 14, 1942 - May 16, 2010)

Top
 Profile  
sisters_of_merciless
Metal newbie

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:33 pm
Posts: 151
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:02 pm 
 

Napero is right, I merge reviews of splits (but not the splits themselves).

If you click on any reviewer, I just added a breakdown of their reviews by release type (there were already breakdowns by band, country and style).

Top
 Profile  
Evangelion2014
Metalhead

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 2:59 am
Posts: 438
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 1:52 am 
 

Favorite Genres:
Black Metal (everything)
Power (everything)
Death Metal (all but 'br00tal'/slam death, but normal brutal death is ok it's on a band by band basis)
Viking/Folk (More the Moonsorrow/Bathory style stuff than say, finntroll or korplikanni)
Experimental/Avant-Garde

May Review:
Grindcore
Thrash Metal
Traditional Metal
Doom/drone/stoner (more likely if it is epic doom)
Symphonic
Crossover Thrash
Speed Metal

Will Not review:
Gothic
Groove

*Note I am doing a 'Adventures in Metalcore' series so I am reviewing a bunch of metalcore/deathcore stuff, a genre I normally don't listen to. I am reviewing objectively rather than just slamming metalcore bands because I can.

Top
 Profile  
vegetable
Metal newbie

Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:05 am
Posts: 122
PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 11:24 am 
 

I haven't posted too many reviews, but I generally avoid posting reviews for genres I don't like and would prefer that others do the same. So this is a good idea.

Like:
Death Metal
Grindcore
Punk/Crossover/etc.

Infrequent listener of:
Thrash
Older Heavy Metal (Sabbath, Rainbow, etc.)

Top
 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancient Sunlight and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

 
Jump to:  

Back to the Encyclopaedia Metallum


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group