|
Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives
Message board
|
| View previous topic
:: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SuperVeji4
Metalhead
Joined: 17 Sep 2006
Posts: 732
|
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:13 pm Post subject: The Search for the Ultimate Truth |
|
|
I’m currently taking Humanities and I must say that I love the class. What really caught my attention however was the teacher, for he seemed to be intelligent, open-minded, and just overall interesting. So I decided to go to his office after class to meet the guy and to talk to him about life. I’ve discovered that the man is a humanist, a philanthropist, and a great admirer of ancient philosophers like Socrates. What really caught my attention however, were the things he said.
If I remember correctly, Socrates and his follower Plato believed that there is an absolute, Ultimate Truth to everything, a truth/explanation that all of humanity would agree on, thus creating a universal brotherhood. They believed that everyone seeks the same thing, which, if I remember correctly, was power, respect, and happiness, and that it is Wisdom and Knowledge that will bring us these things. Wisdom and Knowledge will help us discover the Ultimate Truth, and the Ultimate Truth will bring us power, respect, and happiness. There is only one Ultimate Truth, and this Ultimate Truth will satisfy all of humanity for all time. Our sense of wanting money, pleasure, material things, and also the differences that separate all of us are all just illusions and distractions, distractions that block us from seeking the Ultimate Truth. In different ways of expressing it, we all tend to believe that we are detached from one another, when the reality is that we are all very similar, and we are very much connected with everything and everyone. This Ultimate Truth has not yet been found.
Obviously I thought this was bullshit, I mean it sounds too much like a generalization. However, I thought about it some more and a weird thought came to my mind. Almost every philosopher I know of (which I'll admit, isn't many), whether they were religious, atheistic, optimistic, or pessimistic, generally say the same thing. From the ones I know, they all basically say, “Seek Knowledge and Wisdom, for they will bring you the Truth. Do not be entirely distracted (“reject” in some cases) by temptation and physical wants like money or material things, for they will interfere with your search for the Truth.” Philosophers from different parts of the globe and different time periods saying the same thing. Are all these philosophers from the past and present, people most of us consider geniuses, wrong in this idea that there is a single Ultimate Truth that will unite and satisfy all of us, thus creating a universal brotherhood?
This idea of an Ultimate Truth reminded me of something else. I’ve heard from some artists, writers, and musicians that believe that their artistic creativity and creations come from beyond the physical world, a “realm” where ideas are ultimately from. I believe it was Stephen King who said that he had a feeling that there is such a “realm”, and that artists, from all fields, have a special gift that helps them to “see” into this “realm”, and what they create is a “message” or a “teaching” from this “realm”. All that matters is your ability in acquiring these messages accurately, and conveying these messages in a clear and organized way. Is this “realm” related to the Ultimate Truth that Socrates was speaking of?
One last thing that crossed my mind. Now I know that religion is a touchy subject here, but is the concept of God another way of saying “Ultimate Truth”? The idea that there is only “one”, and that if found, it will bring respect, power, and happiness to us all, does that not sound like the concept of God? In the end, I came to understand, mostly, with what the teacher was saying, for he strongly believed that there is such a thing of an Ultimate Truth. We all generally seek the same thing, but we argue too much on who’s right and who’s wrong for we are all passionate in this quest in searching for the Ultimate Truth, and this passion blinds us from understanding and seeing the similarities between all beliefs, teachings, and practices. The different names we use, whether it be God, Allah, Ultimate Truth, Ultimate Explanation, whatever, blind us and confuse us, and this leads into conflict. But it is silly, because in the end, no matter what name you want to slap onto it, it’s all the same. It sounds silly and maybe even confusing to some, but for some reason there’s something in there that I find to be very intriguing, and that there is some truth somewhere in there. Then again, after all this thinking, perhaps I’m just overanalyzing the hell out of the whole thing
Do you people agree with this idea of an Ultimate Truth? If you do, why? If you don’t, why not? Can we ever discover on what the Ultimate Truth is? Are we all really after the same thing, we just express it differently? And if so, then is there a way to make people aware of this misunderstanding, and to make them realize that we are all after the same thing? The idea of world peace and perfect harmony just sounds silly, cliché, and just plain far fetched, but is it really impossible? And if so, then is there a way to at least form a universal sense of tolerance and understanding with one another? Not exactly agreeing, but…tolerate. At least to a certain degree? And if it truly is impossible, then is it still worth a shot in forming this kind of change or is it best to not even try?
What do you guys think?
EDIT: Took out the bits on the Ultimate Equation. It wasen't sitting well with most people, and after thinking about it I've come to agree with them.
Last edited by SuperVeji4 on Tue Sep 29, 2009 11:38 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Singularity
Metalhead
Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 403
Location: United States of America
|
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A very quick note on a specific point: the "Ultimate Equation".
What you are referring to, or rather what physicists like Hawking talk about, is the so-called "Theory of Everything", a term that is truly confusing to the lay person. The objective here, is not, I repeat, NOT about finding an equation or a set of equations that can explain everything in the world. In other words even if we could determine these equations, that would not make any difference to most of the research that is being carried out in physics not to mention other areas such as chemistry, applied physics and engineering. Problems in solid state physics, material sciences, astrophysics, nano-technology, laser physics etc will be untouched by such a development.
SO, what do they mean by "theory of everything"? It refers to the unification of the basic interactions of nature namely, the electromagnetic, the weak (these two are already unified and known as electroweak), the strong interaction and gravitation (the last of this is note ven quantized). More technically, it is about unifying all these interactions into a single gauge group at certain energy scales (that are very high).
This is a very widespread misunderstanding that largely arises from incorrectly phrasing the objective sought. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mtlzr
Metal newbie
Joined: 04 Mar 2009
Posts: 38
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Existence is probably the only 'Ultimate Truth' there is, as far as it refers to the universe 'as we know it'. Apart from facts based on said existence, truth seems to be subjective.
I do not search for such a truth, I search for happiness (with happiness meaning a sense of sufficient comfort). I have formed an image of happiness in my mind, so I pursue it the best I can. What use is this Truth anyway, if it is only means to an end? And what if it exists, why would it create a sense of understanding? There are many teachings that advocate moral guidelines which would surely lead to that end if every person adhered to them.
This Truth is a very appealing thought, since it would give a 'shortcut' to happiness. Wealth and power are secondaries to that, since wealth and power give a certain degree of happiness in human society and are also merely tools.
Religion is different from this thought of Truth, since it gives you its Truth right away without you having to look for it.
The artistic realm you mention is called imagination, which is a product of a fertile and creative mind.
Your thoughts are valid, elaborate and interesting, but very glorifying - have you questioned them? _________________ http://metallizer.blogsome.com |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stormalv
Metalhead
Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 689
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm thinking about this a lot too. And yes, arguing about religions is misleading, it prevents you from seeing everything they have in common, and that they may have come from some divine experience.
But is there an absolute truth, and if you get to know it, how can you be so sure it is true? The only thing I consider to be 100% certain is that I exist, and that things like math and rational thoughts are right (the idea 2 plus the idea 2 is the idea 4).
I was thinking about this earlier today, some people say they have great experiences on drugs which make them spiritual, even though they were materialistic atheists before, but the skeptics will simply say they had a powerful hallucination that they're desperate to make sense of. But you know the feeling when you've woken up, got out of bed and you're making coffee, that certainty that you have awoken from the dream, this is not a false awakening, what if there is a similar experience you can have on drugs, seeing the waking life as a mere dream?
Then you have the mystery of consciousness, how does it interact with the brain? If we are One as the spiritual people say, why do we feel separate? Are we eternal, and if so, how can we fathom the concept?
Then there is the theory that reality is a collectice hallucination, and that everything exists and happens because we think it. People will say, but if you think an oven is off, you might burn yourself on it and be surprised. But on a deep subconscious level, you might know that it is actually hot!! But too deep for your conscious mind to account for. _________________ My band's myspace profile:
www.myspace.com/mortiferiaofficial |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rottenrectum
Metalhead
Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 1649
Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think these two concepts should not be mixed. The way I interpret "ultimate truth" would be answer to the question "why?". Why are we here? Why do we live? Why do the universe exist? All these question imply that there has to be some kind of meaning, a thought behind it all and therefor should not be mixed with the search for a theory of everything, or as mentioned here, an "ultimate equation". That would deal with the question "how?". How did we end up here? How did the universe come to be? How did life begin? These imply no meaning what so ever, they only require a rational explanation to be answered. Leave "why?" to religion.
Take M-theory for example, probably the top contender for this "ultimate equation". If it turned out to be correct, would it give any kind of meaning to life, the universe and existence? No it wouldn't . It would simply tell us how things work.
I believe there is no ultimate truth. The only rational explanation for me is existence is indifferent and therefor have no meaning or thought behind it, thus rendering life meaningless as well. The whole concept of meaning is created by humans. On the other hand, I would agree with Socrates on the point about wisdom and knowledge. The pursuit of ever greater wisdom and knowledge would be the closest thing to a meaning for me. I guess I would be more comfortable with the concept "ultimate wisdom" or "ultimate knowledge". _________________ DEATH JÄVLA METAL
| darkdead wrote: | | I have still quarrelling the musician. |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SuperVeji4
Metalhead
Joined: 17 Sep 2006
Posts: 732
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mtlzr wrote: | | Your thoughts are valid, elaborate and interesting, but very glorifying - have you questioned them? |
Of course I have, I'm not taking my thoughts as fact. As I stated before, I'm probably just overanalyzing the whole thing. Thinking too much in other words. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hey
Metal newbie
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 334
Location: United States of America
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 7:09 pm Post subject: Re: The Search for the Ultimate Truth |
|
|
| SuperVeji4 wrote: |
If I remember correctly, Socrates and his follower Plato believed that there is an absolute, Ultimate Truth to everything, a truth/explanation that all of humanity would agree on, thus creating a universal brotherhood. They believed that everyone seeks the same thing, which, if I remember correctly, was power, respect, and happiness, and that it is Wisdom and Knowledge that will bring us these things. Wisdom and Knowledge will help us discover the Ultimate Truth, and the Ultimate Truth will bring us power, respect, and happiness. There is only one Ultimate Truth, and this Ultimate Truth will satisfy all of humanity for all time. Our sense of wanting money, pleasure, material things, and also the differences that separate all of us are all just illusions and distractions, distractions that block us from seeking the Ultimate Truth. In different ways of expressing it, we all tend to believe that we are detached from one another, when the reality is that we are all very similar, and we are very much connected with everything and everyone. This Ultimate Truth has not yet been found.
|
I think that all humans are rationally self-interested. They participate in an activity until the marginal benefits of participating in it are equal to the marginal costs of participating in it. I can't imagine anything else being an Ultimate Truth. Also, I don't think we will ever have perfect harmony, because we're trying to fill our unlimited wants with limited resources. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Blakktaboule
Metal newbie
Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Posts: 32
Location: United States of America
|
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| What an interesting inquiry. I have wondered sometimes about the true reason we exist. I have been raised a Christian, and continue to be one, so I have my beliefs. But it is interesting to contemplate philosophy and the truth to everything. I was recently watching a TV program about string theory and stuff like that. PHilosophy is very interesting. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Danthrax_Nasty
Metalhead
Joined: 18 Oct 2003
Posts: 1584
Location: United States of America
|
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ultimate truth is just a philosophical meme used to aggrandize privately held conjecture, with a purpose only to confuse people (or indoctrinate), as in the end its an entirely unanswerable question, and being so serves little to constructive purpose. The ultimate truth is, there is no ultimate truth. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Osmium
The Hateful Raven
Joined: 22 Nov 2003
Posts: 4201
|
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Blakktaboule wrote: | | What an interesting inquiry. I have wondered sometimes about the true reason we exist. I have been raised a Christian, and continue to be one, so I have my beliefs. But it is interesting to contemplate philosophy and the truth to everything. I was recently watching a TV program about string theory and stuff like that. PHilosophy is very interesting. |
There are two ways to understand the word "reason" as you have used it. The first is causal/mechanistic: "what is the cause of us existing?" Well, the answer to that is our respective parents, and their respective parents, so on back into the mists of time until you get to simpler and simpler animals; eventually, single-celled organisms; finally self-replicating molecules; then proper conditions on the early earth, etc. etc. Basically you can trace the mechanistic causes of our existence and their causes ad infinitum into the past until you bump into the Big Bang, before which it is unclear what exactly the state of affairs was.
The second way is the cognitive/intentional. When you say, "what is the reason you put the cup on the table?" you're not asking what the string of causal events was that led you to putting it on the table. You're asking why you chose to act the way that you did. But this question makes no sense when concerned with our existence. There is no good reason to suppose that everything in the universe was caused intentionally by an intelligent agent, so the question has no meaning. It's like asking "what is the reason that the sky looks blue?" You can explain various facts about our eyesight, light refraction, atmospheric science, etc., but you still wouldn't get to the intentionality behind the sky being blue because there is nobody who just decided that the sky would be blue. It just is. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Acidgobblin
Metal newbie
Joined: 27 Sep 2009
Posts: 344
Location: Antarctica
|
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Danthrax_Nasty wrote: | | Ultimate truth is just a philosophical meme used to aggrandize privately held conjecture, with a purpose only to confuse people (or indoctrinate), as in the end its an entirely unanswerable question, and being so serves little to constructive purpose. The ultimate truth is, there is no ultimate truth. |
You contradict yourself there
There is no ultimate truth- life just IS. The tao that can be named is not the real tao, et al.
However, a healthy dose of ayahuasca can certainly help one defne reality, which appears neccesary to discover if this reality has any ultimate truth.
I would say its meaning lies in its meaningless-ness. And thus, I agree with the post I quoted  |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Avaddons_blood
Veteran
Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Posts: 2802
Location: United States of America
|
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is no god. The meaning and purpose of life is whatever you give it. We are all made of star stuff.
If you want something more complex look at the Theory of everything and the standard model. That probably isn't what you want though. _________________ Open mindedness.
"The whole religious complexion of the modern world is due to the absence from Jerusalem of a lunatic asylum." -Thomas Paine |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Shovel
Wyruld Cyninga
Joined: 19 Mar 2003
Posts: 7555
Location: United States of America
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Osmium wrote: | | Blakktaboule wrote: | | What an interesting inquiry. I have wondered sometimes about the true reason we exist. I have been raised a Christian, and continue to be one, so I have my beliefs. But it is interesting to contemplate philosophy and the truth to everything. I was recently watching a TV program about string theory and stuff like that. PHilosophy is very interesting. |
There are two ways to understand the word "reason" as you have used it. The first is causal/mechanistic: "what is the cause of us existing?" Well, the answer to that is our respective parents, and their respective parents, so on back into the mists of time until you get to simpler and simpler animals; eventually, single-celled organisms; finally self-replicating molecules; then proper conditions on the early earth, etc. etc. Basically you can trace the mechanistic causes of our existence and their causes ad infinitum into the past until you bump into the Big Bang, before which it is unclear what exactly the state of affairs was.
The second way is the cognitive/intentional. When you say, "what is the reason you put the cup on the table?" you're not asking what the string of causal events was that led you to putting it on the table. You're asking why you chose to act the way that you did. But this question makes no sense when concerned with our existence. There is no good reason to suppose that everything in the universe was caused intentionally by an intelligent agent, so the question has no meaning. It's like asking "what is the reason that the sky looks blue?" You can explain various facts about our eyesight, light refraction, atmospheric science, etc., but you still wouldn't get to the intentionality behind the sky being blue because there is nobody who just decided that the sky would be blue. It just is. |
You, my friend, deserve a high-five. I believe that when most people say "why are we here?". they infer your second reason. I fully agree with your explanation; there is no "why", we just are. I could write an entire essay about the fallacies of "intelligent design", but I'm too fucking drunk right now to. Suffice to say, the notion of intelligent design (of the universe, not just evolution) is based on circular logic, and as such, is irrelevant. The universe is neither "ordered" nor "chaotic", it just is. _________________ Still breathing |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Prominence
Metalhead
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 461
Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Being a skeptic, I believe this "Truth" is most likely existent but unattainable. Perhaps it is the ultimate enlightenment and resolve experienced in death, or perhaps it is the key to "The Overman" (Thus Spoke Zarathustra), and as such is somewhere deep within (which I believe everything and every form of potential is), simply incredibly difficult to tap.
My overall take on it is if the "greatest of the great minds" who were the one who conceptualized it, but still could not attain it (or if they did, kept it secret), there's little chance of one of us discovering what it is. Sure, our generation is "standing on the shoulders of giants", but we mostly lack the innovation which made these giants in the first place, and without innovation how can we hope to attain something of such high status which to our knowledge has not been found yet?
I'm sure many others like myself have had brief moments of clarity when in some obscure, vague way, multiple seemingly disconnected segments of reality come together in some sort of unison never before thought of, but yet they fit together so perfectly. It's typical of, but not exclusive to psychoactives. At least in my experience. This would lead me to indicate there is potential for some sort of Ultimate Truth existing, however I still can't really see how it would be practically attained. And if it can't exist in our realm, within the presence of some human mind, then it must not exist. But if it does, it must somehow be able to be tapped.
However... This is also reminiscent of some sort of Ultimate Answer, a concept I also am very skeptical and disbelieving of. If the meaning to our existences was discovered, would it not lose its meaning? Philosophy and all forms of imagination would be lost. Humans are a creature that require some mystery, some sort of shaded area so that we can fill in the potential blanks with our imaginations. How else would there be hundreds of hollywood films all based around the foundation of some different brand of apocalypse? Despite the Ultimate Truth or Answer's seemingly glowing, positive image, I believe it would ultimately be harmful to our existences, and barely if at all beneficiary. But this could be completely false, perhaps it will usher in an entirely new era of Utopia.
I believe the idea of an Ultimate Answer to be some sort of paradox, and being so similar to this Ultimate Truth, I believe the same may be true for that. Some obscure paradox beyond humans' possible comprehension.
Also, great call with Humanities. I'm applying for Humanities for next September's term.
Last edited by Prominence on Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:49 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vordreller
Mallcore Kid
Joined: 24 Mar 2009
Posts: 9
Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm getting the impression that the title of this thread might just as well be "Why are we here?"
My answer: I don't care. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
krampus
Metalhead
Joined: 07 Jul 2009
Posts: 400
Location: Japan
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Truth for every individual is something different, and varies wildly depending on one's priorities, beliefs, upbringing, where he/she lives, etc. There is no greater misery than chasing an elusive Truth and constantly reminding yourself that you haven't found it yet, and I sincerely believe that most people can be happier knowing that the meaning they create for themselves in life from the mundane and the unremarkable is sufficient to feel like life is worth living.
Perhaps it's a really cynical and lazy viewpoint to take, but I'd much rather accept that there is no inherent meaning or special truth to being a living person than agonize over searching for that meaning or truth for the duration of a lifetime. While a certain amount of soul-searching and curiosity is necessary to keep us from becoming entirely complacent lumps uninterested in higher thought, the hedonist in me wants to spout out cliches like "There is no meaning in life except for what we assign it" and just enjoy myself without worry that I've failed to achieve some possibly unattainable goal. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Singularity
Metalhead
Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 403
Location: United States of America
|
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I honestly see no reason why this topic is even allowed to continue. Unless you define what is meant by ultimate truth it does not even make any sense to discuss it. The only reasonable definition of it would be the sum total of all true propositions one can make regarding the universe. Now, owing to epistemological hurdles it is nearly impossible to find absolute truth about any particular phenomena or event in the world (as opposed to deductions from an axiomatic system) let alone everything in it. But even if I let this important fact pass through, the set of all true propositions is ill-defined in the dominant framework of logical system used today.*
That really is the end of discussion.
*Zermelo Fraenkel with the Axiom of Choice (ZFC) -this discussion came up earlier when Scorpio pointed to this fact. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
matrixmetal
Metal newbie
Joined: 08 Aug 2009
Posts: 107
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | SuperVeji4: What do you guys think? |
This OP was excellent. I hope that I can do it some justice.
We're in the Matrix. The human condition, the reality which we try so hard to explain, is the result of an unbalanced equation inherent to the programming of the Matrix.
The ideas that we cling to & our own personal experiences ( rational or hypothetical ) provide us some meaning/comfort in this existence, but, the Matrix cannot tell you WHO YOU ARE, nor can it answer the 4 GREAT questions that every human asks themselves:
Who am I? Where did I come from? What is my purpose here? And where am I going... ... after this is over?
By using the reflective potential of the creative/artistic human mind it is possible to answer these 4 Great Questions and to define ( speaking only for myself here ) the meaning of my life & discover the variables of the so-called Ultimate Equation(s), digitally represented in the Cosmos as a sequence of zeros and ones.
That's how I would respond, in my own words, which are simply ideas stolen across time & space. Wittgenstien went mad thinking of such things. Neitzsche, too.
One of my favorite quotes on the subject comes from film director Jean Luc-Godard “…the spectacle of life is intermingled with its analysis". _________________ What is that sound? God damn evilness and brutality and a sickening sense of impending doom. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
matrixmetal
Metal newbie
Joined: 08 Aug 2009
Posts: 107
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
For what it matters. If it matters to you. You could check out the underground, renegade philosophical movements happening on youtube & stickam.
They are participating in an open lyceum of virtual reality, a digital campfire of existentialism, where the doom & gloomers and the phantasmagoricals all get along, to a degree, dissecting subjective deconstructions of reality with a healthy dose of skepticism. They are having an extended virtual conversation about these same basic philosophical questions as the OP has suggested. So the matrix equation I am attempting to show you is : If you seek a truth you will find. Period. Emphasis on the period. If you want to go very deep, deep, deep you have to dig deep, deep, deeper. _________________ What is that sound? God damn evilness and brutality and a sickening sense of impending doom. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
206
Metalhead
Joined: 19 Jul 2008
Posts: 1061
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
I believe there is not a truth that pertains to the dominate species on the third planet orbiting the distant sun named Sol. Further, I believe all creatures on Earth learn how to feel before they learn how to think. As innately emotional beings, we "feel" there is no truth in relation to us, but since we as yet cannot properly articulate our emotions, our words come out muddled in images like God, Being and Emptiness.
To put that another way: Since there is no universal truth pertaining directly to man, man made his own truth pertaining to the universe.
| Prominece wrote: | | Being a skeptic, I believe this "Truth" is most likely existent but unattainable. |
According to that statement, you are actually an Agnostic. Look it up  _________________ Chainsaw Justice - The law works best in your own hands. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SuperVeji4
Metalhead
Joined: 17 Sep 2006
Posts: 732
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I find it interesting when people believe that life, the universe, and everything in it, is simply pointless. Everything is just. I understand fully why they would say that, and depending the time and mood I'm in, I would probably agree. However, we humans have this extreme curiosity, this extreme need in exploring, spreading, understanding, and discovering everything thats around us. And we have the ability in creating outrageous things like a space shuttle that takes us beyond the skies, which I think is proof of our extreme need and desire in finding answers. And all this for what? Nothing? We have this extreme need to explore and the abilties in making the exploration possible, yet these things are usless because the universe is, afterall, pointless? The answer could be "yes," but that would be extremely dissapointing, and there many times in which I feel that that answer is just a fucking cop out. This great curiosity and abilitiy in exploring, and all we can come up with is that life and the universe is pointless, and they're nothing but a giant, massive, galactic, cosmic coincidence? Hard to believe. But then again, that may in fact be the actual answer and truth...
Fascinating shit. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
phoenix6669
Mallcore Kid
Joined: 30 Oct 2009
Posts: 12
|
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Acidgobblin wrote: | The tao that can be named is not the real tao, et al.
However, a healthy dose of ayahuasca can certainly help one defne reality, which appears neccesary to discover if this reality has any ultimate truth.
|
Hehe, I agree...
| Osmium wrote: |
There are two ways to understand the word "reason" as you have used it. The first is causal/mechanistic: "what is the cause of us existing?" Well, the answer to that is our respective parents, and their respective parents, so on back into the mists of time until you get to simpler and simpler animals; eventually, single-celled organisms; finally self-replicating molecules; then proper conditions on the early earth, etc. etc. Basically you can trace the mechanistic causes of our existence and their causes ad infinitum into the past until you bump into the Big Bang, before which it is unclear what exactly the state of affairs was.
The second way is the cognitive/intentional. When you say, "what is the reason you put the cup on the table?" you're not asking what the string of causal events was that led you to putting it on the table. You're asking why you chose to act the way that you did. But this question makes no sense when concerned with our existence. There is no good reason to suppose that everything in the universe was caused intentionally by an intelligent agent, so the question has no meaning. It's like asking "what is the reason that the sky looks blue?" You can explain various facts about our eyesight, light refraction, atmospheric science, etc., but you still wouldn't get to the intentionality behind the sky being blue because there is nobody who just decided that the sky would be blue. It just is. |
There is a third way to interpret the question of "Ultimate Truth", and I would say it is the principal way, the right vantage point for considering Truth.. it is a matter of existential dilemma, and where we go from there.. it has to do with what one knows for certain, as such knowledge, as a matter of wisdom rather than ignorance, is inextricably linked with the efficiency of action.. with all things, from driving a car well, to knowing what you truly want.. or even, is there an afterlife?.. to say that knowledge is not power is to say that reality is irrational in nature rather than rational.. the fact is, that to say that nothing can be known for certain, this is necessarily a fallacious statement: to say that nothing can be known for certain requires at least one absolute certainty, obviously--that nothing can be known for certain! Now to hold Truth as something beyond this fundamental question of knowing, to hold it as some actually independently-sustained thing that's somehow a regulating and/or unifying agent of reality, then this is another matter altogether, and indeed to jump to such conclusion as certain with first establishing a framework of certainty from which to work, is obviously a flawed approach..
The problem of existential dilemma is actually of extreme value and chronically ignored and denied/repressed in modern society.. only upon its spurs can one truly recognize the questions to ask, and only then can one progress forwards.. the the reality of existential dilemma is that the reality paradigm of the average person is, essentially, based exclusively on induction, and this is a paramount problem. For example, just because every day when you come home from work and when you open the door to your apartment you find your apartment inside, what is to say that when you come home from work and open the same door tomorrow that you will not find a gaping, black void? This is the proverbial Abyss in occultism, this mystery and great source of fear (though even in occultism the subject matter is heavily diluted and trivialized). If one assumes that there is no afterlife, how can one be certain?.. indeed how can one be certain that they cannot potentially realize an existence literally one thousand times superior than what they presently realize?.. there can be no certainty about anything at all, not even probability gets you anywhere because it's all based on induction..
So establishing proper metaphysical foundation is of paramount importance.. a symptom of the confusion of modern times is how the divine or Truth or what-have-you is so often said to be ineffable or beyond human comprehension or impossible to know for certain.. but is the whole of reality but one, omnipotent banana peel?.. no obviously not, as more than just a banana peel is witnessed every second of the day.. so just like enlightenment is described (at least as far as summary description is concerned) not as what it is but as what it is not, as freedom from suffering, similarly can reality actually be defined, can absolute certainty begin to take shape, through the rigors of logic and the process of elimination. For example, does infinity exist? Obviously not because infinity would entail strict boundlessness but that would imply that ALL possibilities are true however ALL possibilities cannot but be to some extent mutually exclusive therefore infinity as the concept is general taken to mean cannot exist.. notice how not even this simple fact is well understood in the modern marketplace of ideas..
Namaste |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|