Psychologically, there is really no such thing as "The official thing" when it comes to psychometric testing; no single measure is going to create a complete picture - they're really best only used for diagnostic purposes, as opposed to mental self-exploration.

I've never been a huge fan of MBTI tests, because they only recognise polarities, and not magnitudes, and it's in magnitudes which the real information resides - pure introspection feels vastly more reassuring than psychometrics to me. When it comes to personality theory, I'm fond of the Big-5 OCEAN measure; openness, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness and neuroticism.

I don't agree, however, that MBTI tests only recognize polarities. There's a wealth of information behind the deceivingly simple 4-letter designation, but most people stop after doing an online test, and see their type as a prescription rather than a launchpad.

I find the keys2cognition test very confusing. They seem more like a checklist for a psychiatrist analyzing a patient from an outside perspective, not for self-assessment. Am I too stupid, or is it just a badly designed test?

Here are two online "tests" that I like, if you haven't taken one before.
http://keys2cognition.com/explore.htm
http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp

ENFJ: Extravert(11%) iNtuitive(75%) Feeling(25%) Judging(67%)

You have slight preference of Extraversion over Introversion (11%)
You have distinctive preference of Intuition over Sensing (75%)
You have moderate preference of Feeling over Thinking (25%)
You have distinctive preference of Judging over Perceiving (67%)

Your Cognitive Development Profile:
The forty-eight questions you rated earlier tap into the eight cognitive processes. Some questions tapped into basic or developed use of a process used by itself, while other questions tapped into use of multiple processes at once. The profile below is based on your responses. The number of squares indicate strength of response. The equivalent numeric is shown in parentheses along with likely level of development.

Cognitive Process Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use)
extraverted Sensing (Se) ************************************* (37.5)
excellent use
introverted Sensing (Si) ********************** (22.9)
limited use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ************************** (26.1)
average use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) ************************************** (38.3)
excellent use
extraverted Thinking (Te) *********************** (23.1)
limited use
introverted Thinking (Ti) *************** (15.1)
unused
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ***************************** (29.1)
average use
introverted Feeling (Fi) *********************************************** (47.5)
excellent use

Summary Analysis of Profile:
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: ISFP

Lead (Dominant) Process
Introverted Feeling (Fi): Staying true to who you really are. Paying close attention to your personal identity, values and beliefs. Checking with your conscience. Choosing behavior congruent with what is important to you.

Support (Auxilliary) Process
Extraverted Sensing (Se): Immersing in the present context. Responding naturally to everything tangible you detect through your senses. Checking with what your gut instincts say. Testing limits and take risks for big rewards.

Lead (Dominant) Process
Introverted Feeling (Fi): Staying true to who you really are. Paying close attention to your personal identity, values and beliefs. Checking with your conscience. Choosing behavior congruent with what is important to you.

Support (Auxilliary) Process
Extraverted Sensing (Se): Immersing in the present context. Responding naturally to everything tangible you detect through your senses. Checking with what your gut instincts say. Testing limits and take risks for big rewards.

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is pseudoscience, plain and simply. It has low reliability as well as low validity, which makes it a poor test of personality, if it's even measuring it at all. Sure, it justifies itself by saying it's an application of Jung's research but even his work in that field was based off of medieval writings on personality. It's definitely interesting to see what you can get, but the MBTI is a poor measure of it. A better measure of personality is through the Big Five Personality Traits test, which is the current test used to determine personality in academia. It still has its problems but it's currently the best we have.

http://personality-testing.info/tests/BIG5.php

And in case you're wondering, I got ISTJ.

http://personality-testing.info/tests/BIG5.php

Thanks for sharing guys. I get the arguments against MBTI, about how its not scientifically validated and all that. BUT you can still learn a lot from it, providing that you're not just reading a general description, and assuming that its a box that all people of that type have to fit into.