Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives
https://forum.metal-archives.com/

Toxik reform
https://forum.metal-archives.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=96046
Page 2 of 2

Author:  LegendMaker [ Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

My feelings regarding this news are rather neutral. I really enjoy some Toxik, but I wasn't exactly craving for more. Also, I'm on the fence (haha) between the wildly optimistic and the stone-cold cynical regarding the likeliness of a come-back album meeting expectations (that's a big step for me, I used to be firmly in the latter camp). So yeah. Is it necessary? No. Can it be good? Maybe. We'll see.

Metal_Detector wrote:
Think This [is] more like Proggy/techy USPM than thrash like World Circus or similar tech/thrash bands like Realm (Endless War). The vocal performance and songwriting lead in a more progressive direction, even if their roots are in thrash.

Now, this is more like it. I quite like that album, albeit nowhere near as much as some here, but it couldn't be a thrash album if it's life and those of a hundred puppies depended on it. My personal experience of Toxik's music was that I bought 'Think This' a million years ago, and although I certainly liked it, I wasn't really sure what to make of it. It wasn't every day I stumbled upon a glam/prog/speed hybrid back then (and this hasn't changed to this day).

On the one hand, Toxik's ties with a band like Skid Row and Josh Christian's haircut both made sense, as a lot of aspects of the album were screaming "BACKGROUND TO YOUR WORKOUT, BABY!", including the whole concept, the homo-erotically "muscular" yet objectively neutered production job (big fat Toys 'R Us-sounding snare and double-bass drums > clean vocals > biteless mediums-über-alles compressed rhythm guitar tone > the rest), the "laugh all you want now, but wait until you end up loving the song I introduce and consequently have to endure me each fucking time you listen to it!" goofy TV samples, the Weiki-level embarrassing ballad, a number of solos, and some high-pitched sexy-in-a-Cherry-Pie-way vocal vibratos & group hugs in back-up vocal form, notably.

On the other hand, the fact that they saluted a bunch of thrash and speed bands in the liner notes also made sense, as there are plenty of songs and moments on this album that are more akin to ambitious, no-holds-barred power/speed songwriting wise, with some technical thrash influence and a complex, weird-as-fuck yet very entertaining approach to arrangements. Stuff like "Spontaneous", "In God", the title track, "Shotgun Logic" or "Technical Arrogance", for the most part. In that sense, the album has more to do with an odd mixture of classic-era Agent Steel and mid-period Voivoid than it does Cinderella, for sure. But does it make it thrash in and of itself? Fuck no.

Mind you, this opinion was formed before the Internet and MA and being regularly exposed to widespread fan opinions that are sometimes so wildly opposed to my own analysis that they can only come across as conspiracies. I was still regularly exposed to widespread critics opinions, and back then paper magazine reviews still had some sort of consistency and credibility (I'm talking late 80s early 90s here), but the French metal press back then was content slapping the melodic speed metal tag on that stuff, with or without "progressive" or "technical" to nuance it, and that was fine by me (it's also what they called Keepers-era Helloween back then, but hey! good times). When I first discovered this site a few years ago and found out a lot of people seemed to be adamant on calling this thrash, I went "lol what?!". I've just given the album a fresh listen while reading this thread and typing this post, and well... this is still no fucking thrash, folks.

'World Circus', while somewhat melodic (more in a classic-era Anthrax way than in a EuroPM way) is certainly a relentless and technical speed/thrash album with character, class and energy in spades, though. I'm absolutely fine with calling that one thrash. I suppose the fact that it came first is the main reason people still mistakenly think of 'Think This', its sophomore, as being thrash as well. Well, think again, guys. It's not.

On a side note, are you people deliberately yanking ANA's chain by pretending not to get his obvious joke? He posted "Think this sucks. Listen to some real thrash" with a link to a Bon-Jovi's-hairdo-meets-Californication sappy ballad containing 0% of metal. It stands to reason that he was mocking the album's alleged thrashiness. What's not to get? :lol:

Author:  BastardHead [ Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

LegendMaker wrote:
On a side note, are you people deliberately yanking ANA's chain by pretending not to get his obvious joke? He posted "Think this sucks. Listen to some real thrash" with a link to a Bon-Jovi's-hairdo-meets-Californication sappy ballad containing 0% of metal. It stands to reason that he was mocking the album's alleged thrashiness. What's not to get? :lol:


^^^For real

Author:  HamburgerBoy [ Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

I don't hear the Bon Jovi balladry in that Annihilator song to be honest. I get an almost glammed-up-jangle-pop vibe from it (and regardless of what it is, it's easily one of the best songs on that album vs all the derivative trad/groove metal on it). Definitely agree that Think This is pretty far from a thrash album though; I prefer to think of it as simply a progressive metal album, or prog/power. Even the songs that do feature thrash riffs generally don't keep it up for the whole duration.

Author:  Riffs [ Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Ashamed to say I don't remember even hearing about this band, which is kind of strange considering I was into thrash at the time.

Currently listening to some songs off Think This on Youtube and it's not bad at all! Kinda sounds like an Anthrax/Jag Panzer with US prog/power elements to my ear.

Back then, only a few years could really make a difference between success and failure for Thrash bands. This might have had more success around 1985.

Author:  Von Jugel [ Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Riffs wrote:
Ashamed to say I don't remember even hearing about this band, which is kind of strange considering I was into thrash at the time.

Currently listening to some songs off Think This on Youtube and it's not bad at all! Kinda sounds like an Anthrax/Jag Panzer with US prog/power elements to my ear.

Back then, only a few years could really make a difference between success and failure for Thrash bands. This might have had more success around 1985.


I much prefer World Circus. I remember hating it when I first heard it way back when, just couldn't get past the vocals (I actually returned the CD to where I bought it). I found a nice copy on vinyl though just a few months ago (for cheap), so I gave it another shot. Since then it has grown on me. Maybe if I had listened to Watchtower at the time when I first heard it I would have been more prepared.

Author:  Riffs [ Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Von Jugel wrote:
I much prefer World Circus. I remember hating it when I first heard it way back when, just couldn't get past the vocals (I actually returned the CD to where I bought it). I found a nice copy on vinyl though just a few months ago (for cheap), so I gave it another shot. Since then it has grown on me.


I'm gonna give it a try too. Anything in particular you prefer about it?

Author:  ~Guest 282118 [ Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

World Circus is outright crazy technical speed/thrash, Riffs. Completely unhinged, with tons of over the top solos and vocal melodies (their first singer, Mike Sanders, was one of a kind regarding high pitched wailing), riffing that could cut diamonds and a very impressive rhythm section. You should definitely listen to it.

Author:  Von Jugel [ Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Riffs wrote:
Von Jugel wrote:
I much prefer World Circus. I remember hating it when I first heard it way back when, just couldn't get past the vocals (I actually returned the CD to where I bought it). I found a nice copy on vinyl though just a few months ago (for cheap), so I gave it another shot. Since then it has grown on me.


I'm gonna give it a try too. Anything in particular you prefer about it?


Thrashier I'd say, but overall I just like the songs more. Think This is more like Realm's Suiciety, I'd say, but I might prefer the latter. World Circus just has a bit dirtier sound that gives you more of a rush, I don't like it when things sound too clean.

Author:  Jasper92 [ Fri Jun 07, 2013 6:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Snippet of Crooked Crosses. https://soundcloud.com/toxik2013/toxik- ... es-snippet

No vocals, so I don't know about Mike. But at least Josh still has it in him. Sounds great!

And an interview with Josh (starts at 32:20)
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/heavy-meta ... n-of-toxik

Some demo's are going to be redone (wasteland, straight razor). And the new stuff is supposed to sound darker/angrier.

Author:  tomcat_ha [ Fri Jun 07, 2013 7:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

aka more like groove metal!

Author:  Jasper92 [ Fri Jun 07, 2013 8:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Well, I believe he also said it's still thrashy

Author:  joppek [ Fri Jun 07, 2013 8:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

i've always been of the opinion that think this has some fantastic music on it, but the horrible vocals drive me away from it, in much the same way i feel about voivod and merciful fate

Author:  Jasper92 [ Fri Jun 07, 2013 10:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

I love the high pitched vocals within this genre.

Author:  ~Guest 282118 [ Fri Jun 07, 2013 12:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Can't truly judge a snippet of a tune without context, but I actually liked that. Josh still has his knack for going completely bonkers with his guitar, and the riffing retains that bouncy feeling that many of their songs had. Consider me highly optimistic about this.

Author:  thrashinbatman [ Fri Jun 07, 2013 12:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

I didn't like it at first, but the solo started wrapping up, and I was like, "Now there's Toxik." More stuff like that and I'll be all over it.

Author:  ~Guest 82538 [ Fri Jun 07, 2013 6:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

When I went to check it there was a comment saying that it sounded like Blotted Science. I don't entirely disagree. Make of that what you will.

Author:  Thumbman [ Fri Jun 07, 2013 6:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

I'm probably just a cynic, but every time something like this happens I'm immediately worried that they'll do something lame and end up pissing all over their legacy. Who knows, could be really good.

Author:  Z0MBIE [ Fri Jun 07, 2013 6:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Wow, that was weird.. I don't know what to make of it, I don't think I like it.

Author:  HamburgerBoy [ Fri Jun 07, 2013 9:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Sounds thrashier and more aggressive than anything on Think This, and no less technical. I don't even really like their albums that much (which I lament since I love a lot of tech-thrash), but this sounds promising, and I love those kinds of dissonant leads like those that start at 0:27.

Author:  ~Guest 282118 [ Sat Jun 08, 2013 1:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

androdion wrote:
When I went to check it there was a comment saying that it sounded like Blotted Science. I don't entirely disagree. Make of that what you will.

I wouldn't be bothered by that, seeing that Blotted Science is one of the extremely few "instrumental-wank-disguised-as-a-band" kind of projects that I actually like.

Author:  ModusOperandi [ Sat Jun 08, 2013 3:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

^Likewise, and it's disheartening that Jarzombek isn't cited more often as an influence on the technicality in modern bands. Then again, Spastic Ink and Watchtower don't have nearly the "star power" nor recognition as, say, Gorguts by comparison.

I'm cautiously optimistic about a new Toxik album but not necessarily waiting for it with baited breath, either. This could just as easily go the route of Left for Dead by Laaz Rockit for example or any other similar comeback attempt. For what it's worth Jason Bittner of Shadows Fall is drumming on this, but I doubt it'll mean anything more in the big picture than him just playing how he's told to. He seems capable enough and Toxik's always been about the riffs first and foremost, anyway.

Author:  ~Guest 82538 [ Sat Jun 08, 2013 8:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Xlxlx wrote:
androdion wrote:
When I went to check it there was a comment saying that it sounded like Blotted Science. I don't entirely disagree. Make of that what you will.

I wouldn't be bothered by that, seeing that Blotted Science is one of the extremely few "instrumental-wank-disguised-as-a-band" kind of projects that I actually like.

Yeah, but on the other hand going from Think This to The Machinations of Dementia is like a Japanese trying to speak English. It may be technically perfect but it just sounds so wrong! :lol:

ModusOperandi wrote:
^Likewise, and it's disheartening that Jarzombek isn't cited more often as an influence on the technicality in modern bands. Then again, Spastic Ink and Watchtower don't have nearly the "star power" nor recognition as, say, Gorguts by comparison.

Ron is one of the most influential guitarists in my book, at least when it comes to tech/prog stuff. Granted he isn't given the spotlight as others do but it's a different case. Gorguts always had more visibility than Watchtower, they were friends with the Florida crew and knew all the right people in the game. Watchtower on the other hand has always been really underground. But when you take into consideration that it was the band that influenced fucking Atheist... I mean, that says a lot about them. Doug Keyser is probably the most underrated bassist ever!

Author:  Jasper92 [ Thu Aug 15, 2013 3:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Toxik recruited Ralph Santolla

http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/toxik- ... -santolla/

Author:  ~Guest 82538 [ Thu Aug 15, 2013 4:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Jasper92 wrote:

I went from :nono: to :brick: then :fuck: and finally :guns:

Fuck that fucking drunk! :snipe:

Author:  ~Guest 282118 [ Fri Aug 16, 2013 11:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Jasper92 wrote:

The only time this guy had any relevance was when he played in The Stench of Redemption, where he gave an admittedly cool performance. Not thrilled about this though. From what I heard, this bastard made it his mission to fuck up James Murphy's leads during Obituary shows. Not that I'll ever have the opportunity to see them live, but still.

Author:  ~Guest 82538 [ Fri Aug 16, 2013 12:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Xlxlx wrote:
Jasper92 wrote:

The only time this guy had any relevance was when he played in The Stench of Redemption, where he gave an admittedly cool performance. Not thrilled about this though. From what I heard, this bastard made it his mission to fuck up James Murphy's leads during Obituary shows. Not that I'll ever have the opportunity to see them live, but still.

He did, and I've seen it happen. Hence my reaction.

Author:  Oblarg [ Fri Aug 16, 2013 1:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

There's really not much "power metal" about Think This at all, really. There are some subtle nods to Queensryche in places, I guess, but the riff structure really has nothing at all to do with any sort of power metal, be it USPM or euro-power. It's a progressive metal album, with riffs that clearly evolved from thrash but really have developed past it. It's a very mechanical-sounding album, with lots of weird chromatics and unsettling diminished minor stuff, none of which you really find in power metal. I don't get the "glam" accusations, either; there's some keyboard usage and the vocalist is a clean, high-pitched wailer with a hard-rock attitude, but apart from the ballad (which, apart from being damn good, also has some very non-glam atmospheric lead guitar stuff going on in the background) there's really not a single moment on that album that you could hear on a "glam" album without doing a huge double-take. Even the Led Zeppelin cover (which is absurdly out-of-place) doesn't really sound like hard rock anymore, much less glam.

Re: new stuff, I'm not sure how I feel about Toxik without Tad Leger - his drumming is a huge part of why I enjoy Think This so much.

Author:  Dudemanguy [ Fri Aug 16, 2013 1:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Oblarg wrote:
with a hard-rock attitude

And the lyrics on Think This are mostly politically/socially oriented which is a nice nod to punk/hardcore. I think the Zep cover strangely blends in very well on the album actually.

Author:  ~Guest 282118 [ Fri Aug 16, 2013 1:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Toxik reform

Yeah, I'm with Dudemanguy on the topic of the Zep cover. I thought it would stick out like a sore thumb when I saw it on the tracklist, but it turned out to be bizarrely well adapted to Toxik's style.

Everything else Oblarg said is spot on, though.

Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/