Rild wrote:
Mateilkrist wrote:
Rild wrote:
Why bother posting if you aren't going to say anything?
Do you even understand why I made that comparison?
Yes, I do. Dark Funeral are becoming more well-known, almost to the point of being a "gateway band" for new kids, much like Dimmu Borgir. However, they did it without selling out, without compromising their sound, and without plastering their logo on shoes and skateboards to be sold at Hot Topic, all things which Dimmu have done. Comparing a black metal band to Dimmu Borgir is a derogatory thing to say, which is why my post had SOME meaning behind it.
Come on now, let's not start a flame war, we're all capable of mature conversations on this forum.
Well if you had elucidated your point like this in the first place there would be no misunderstanding; I figured you for a vapid fanboy sticking up for DF 'just cuz'.
I understand your point that Dark Funeral has not gone down the path of complete commercialization like Dimmu has, however that does not address my point that DF are a 'nothing-to-add' type of band musically whose function is basically ear-candy/entry band for kids, and for some more experienced listeners as a guilty pleasure (or not, in antipication of you objecting 'I don't need to feel guilty about listening to DF'). This is what my post was actually about, and you seem to have misinterpreted it. The fact that DF's compositional style and instrumentation adheres to the black metal standard while Dimmu Borgir doesn't is not relevant to the point I'm trying to get across. They have absolutely nothing to add to the genre.
I'm not fully understanding your point here, so maybe you can help me fully realize your point:
- "I understand your point that Dark Funeral has not gone down the path of complete commercialization like Dimmu has, however that does not address my point that DF are a 'nothing-to-add' type of band musically whose function is basically ear-candy/entry band for kids"
Are you stating that ear candy and entry bands for kids are one and the same? And if so, how are they considered ear candy when most of their music far removed from the "Symphonic Pseudo-Black" sound of DB, as well as Symphonic Black Metal in the vein of Emperor.
Also, if we're stating that Dark Funeral have nothing to add, then are we also, by the grand council's judgment, bound by Metal Law™ to dislike the similar recordings of Slayer, AC/DC, Unleashed, Dismember, Autopsy and Obituary?
- "and for some more experienced listeners as a guilty pleasure (or not, in antipication of you objecting 'I don't need to feel guilty about listening to DF')."
I am glad you read my mind. Really, why would anyone feel guilty about listening to Dark Funeral?
- "This is what my post was actually about, and you seem to have misinterpreted it. The fact that DF's compositional style and instrumentation adheres to the black metal standard while Dimmu Borgir doesn't is not relevant to the point I'm trying to get across."
...what? I'm not quite sure I understand this either. Your post before this says:
Rild wrote:
Dark Funeral are mainly for BM newbies as ear-candy (as in Dimmu Borgir), and when there are so many better variations of the same theme out there for those of us better acquainted with the genre what's the point?
...and the one before that says...
Rild wrote:
They're a dumb as fuck cartoon band but unfortunately they have some decent tunes. I can't decide which outweighs the other, the engaging riffs and killer drumming, or the sub-retarded lyrics and jack-o'-lantern atmosphere.
So the only thing I can take from this is that you actually like some of this band's songs, but you're somehow scared of enjoying something "dumb as fuck" with "sub-retarded lyrics"? A bit critical, don't you think, as bands who lay on the cheese and stereotypes infinitely thicker that still hold (at the very least) passing, contemptuous respect and (at worse) die-hard fans willing to listen to anything a band member urinates on?
Not trying to single you out here, Rild, but I've seen plenty of people slam Dark Funeral with little reason, so I'm trying to understand where all this is coming from. Personally, I've been listening to Dark Funeral since I found the Secret of the Black Arts at a shop around here around '96, and it was physically distributed by No Fashion Records. I did end up picking up Vobiscum when it came out, and was kind of surprised that Metal Blade ended up getting their logo slapped across it. And I've followed them fairly actively since that point as well, picking up releases as I've found them.
No, they're not groundbreaking, but calling them a gateway band is a bit presumptuous, I think. I have can easily see a Marilyn Manson fan "getting" Cradle of Filth. However, I have a much harder time seeing the leap from Cradle of Filth to, say, Dark Funeral. That'd be a bit like imagining an 80's hair metal fan telling me that The Return... is "pretty rad" - it just doesn't calculate for me.
OT: My Funeral doesn't sound too bad - I'm getting the kind of vibe off of it I got when I first heard Vobiscum Satanas (the song) - slow, malevolent and just a bit weird. The only song off of this one that I might actively hate is "My Latex Queen" - Goddess of Sodomy was the whole reason I put off listening to Diabolis Interium for so long.
Okay, I concede one point - Dark Funeral should really lay off the whole "Mistress / Slave" concept, as it comes across as kinda desperate.